I read that a sense of privacy didn't exist in the USSR is that true?

And living conditions were consistently rising in USSR, population was growing and the education levels were rising, etc. It was going pretty well until the era of stagnation triggered by Brezhnev's failure and then later driven to ground by Gorbachev

Why did Brezhnev fail?

Every revolutionary movement has been leading up to the final revolution, which is for you to *die*

The final revolution is technocracy and transhumanism

Revolutionary movements are environmentalistpilled

And the elites killing all of us Proles

He and the clique he represented - the Kosygin gang etc. - were ultimately bureaucratists and the stagnation stemmed from both the excessive bureaucratism and also from the fact that Kosygin introduced profit rationale to the way Soviet Union functioned. This, of course, was bad for a socialist economy that isn't meant to operate on profit logic. Socialised profit or not, its ultimately disadvantageous for socialism to adopt this.

```> Fascism is the dictatorship of the collective

Fundamentally untrue. Fascism is the dictatorship of the state and the highest tiers of the state leadership to be exact; Fascism, due to its repudiation of democracy as being unconducive to the Fascist spirit, cannot be collective dictatorship because the collective would only be able to execute a collective will as emergent through democratic institutions. Communism can be considered to be dictatorship of the collective, but not Fascism..```

A Leader/Monarch/Premier is in essence supposed to represent the collective will of the Nation, and guide the society to above all else, it's Preservation. Now that is the Ideal.

If they mess things up, all the problems they create are theres to deal with, they can't just shed responsibility after 8 years and leave.. they will have their head at the end of a stick and they are very aware of that..

It isn't ofc a utopia, there are complications with this model too.. @Xinyue

Yes but that's not a very viable "collective dictatorship". That is private dictatorship of the state leadership, in abstract argued to be collective. But not in actual fact nor in the effect.

Fascism is also gay

^

very gay

Agree

Fresh = Marxist Sage confirmed

It’s just as revolutionary as communism

....literally is reactionary by definition tho

Fresh = demoted confirmed

hey now

It’s literally a revolutionary movement

"History does not travel backwards"

literally is not a revolutionary movement

-Mussolini

Fascism isn't Reactionary at all

It is a Modernist ideology

It is revolutionary perhaps in the sense that it posits itself *in opposition of capitalism,* but ultimately in an effort to realise some bygone guild system in a reconstituted form.

Perhaps you see it that way, however, fascism itself does not see itself as reactionary @Xinyue

Especially not Mussolini

Oh fuck oh fuck holy shit oh fuck oh fuck this is bad holy fuck

It’s part of the same erroneous western trend of attempting to immenentize the eschaton

I know, its a label imposed by Marxists

but I'm a Marxist so

can't help it

😁

At least in what I read in the doctrine of fascism

And solve man’s problems politically

there's literally nothing wrong with reactionary politics

There is NO political solution to man’s problems

We should take the Marxists and put them on a boat and float them into the Pacific until they starve to death and then recycle the boat into dildos to own the libs

lmao