Message from @Bearer Of The Curse
Discord ID: 523635914719887360
National liberalism is the way to go to win the masses
Conservatism true virgin ideology
Gets insecure when sees "degeneracy"
Boom
Ah we have so much to discuss π
@Deleted User Clownster role explains alot
a one world muslim government is inevitable
accept your sharia overlords
Insisting conservatism is a true option for the masses is authoritarian since only way it can be achieved is through authoritarian means.
Working class is relatively more conservative then an awerage intelectual.... so...
besides national liberalism is a big gay that doesn't change anything.
The Bible says nothing about fucking Liberalism
It says plenty thats anti feminist
Christians believe in an objective right and wrong, that indulging in vice is sinful, etc. It is natural for a Christian to want evil to be illegal when its appropriate
The state should support the goal of raising a noble and virtuous generation
Christianity is extremely anti-liberal but plenty of "Christians" disagree calling it outdated or not with the times
mainly due to the holes opened up by reformed theologians and catholic Aristotelians and nominalists
Christians claiming their holy book is outdated <:facepalm:508484035274735665>
A lot of modern Christians display a large about of cognitive dissonance; they claim to believe the Bible, but when it comes to civic life they pretend that God isnβt real and they can decide policy using their own reason
Even larpers are more convincing
Reminds me of the phenomenon where trannies actually make more of an effort to appear feminine than thots
Itβs because of nominalism, there is no conception of a female βessenceβ or βformβ, women are merely a collection of traits, so you can become a woman by imitating a bunch of these traits
all the more reason to be apart of neo-platonist gang
No, Neoplatonism is gay too
They have a faulty conception of God
What about Zoroastrianism?
@FreshWholeMilk shut the fuck up liberal
you dare contradict augustine
Augustine introduced a lot of philosophical errors to the western outlook
if you want to talk about philisophical errors on outlook can we talk about the river of fire thing from the orthodoxes
The thing about the river of fire being the same as the river of life?
yes
Itβs not dogmatic that you have to believe that, but it makes a certain amount of sense
Why should animals have rights?
I know you should nt do nonsensical things on principle but I don't understand the argument from ppl on the right that animal testing expecially cosmetic testing on animals is inhumane
We should use sex offenders for that kind of testing
not joking
instead of animals
Because when they become intelligent and form a society, they won't start enslaving us humans