Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 523689354481238030
Ok now you're manipulating the goal
give me any example of someone that did something for other people
like a made up example let's say
uhh donating to charity?
ho ho ho there buddy
its not like thatll do me any good on my resume
You can trace it back to muh feels, but it doesn't matter. If you are only considering muh feels, you'll see that it's an AWFUL trade
Clean your room
although it may look like one is doing something nice, it's not their underlying intent. for example, it could be that people will look good in front of everyone else to donate to charity, or that they are pressered by everyone else to do it. Both of which are selfish intents
But there are people that willingly donate a portion of their goods because they feel that it is the right thing to do
I can speak for myself when I do that
yeah for themselves
also
A soldier that risks his life to save a complete stranger won't be statistically happier than if he hadn't
it is basically a social norm for everyone to donate to charity
In what country lmao
america. most people with money donate to charity
some more than others but still
It's defnitely not a social norm.
It's not even a biological absolute, the survival of the species is way more important than the safety of the individual
@Bearer Of The Curse it could be that that soldier could not have lived with himself had he not done that. or that he wanted to feel better about himself.
>Could
Now you're talking ifs, what about that absolute before?
no it is defiently one of those, just there are more selfish examples therefore i say could. i just do not want to imply that those are the only two reasons
That soldier feels it's his duty to save that person. He will ignore harm and therefore suffer an AWFUL trade if what's in game is your own ego. Even if he has a chance to go out depressed, it's safer to not do so, or even use that person as bait
wait what
are you saying he will be depressed if that person died and he did not save him?
I said a chance, because that would be a somewhat egoistic motive, to not go sick for your inaction. But even then, it's a problem caused by altruism
no it is not
it is caused by the reasons l listed up above. or it could be because it is his job. In this case, he should do that, because he is being payed to do it. Again, an egoistic motive
or some other reason
Welcome
No, in the listed case he's a soldier, he has no financial incentive to save someone
This is not a VIP case
What is the debate?
Egoism
no. that is incorrect. a lot of people are soldeirs because they cannot provide themselves in any other way
he believes altruism exists, i think it does not
Cool down and read the situation again
? cool down ?
You don't lose your job because you keep shooting at the enemy instead of saving a fellow trooper
Actually saving that trooper might cost your job