here

yes

how is that an endorsement of mass famine on all peasantry

So you are saying that the peasents that starved were the bad peasents but the good ones didn't

because you're justifying it for ideological positions and lies on top of that? @Stern

Isn't that what your argument actually boils down to?

@Aki no

the "bad peasants" were actively engaging in terrorism

like Protests?

the "good peasants" were in favor of collectivization

@AdorableStormtrooper slaughtering livestock and burning grain storages

"don't starve us by taking all our grain" = terrorism

yes, they were protests

Well all you are ding is presenting it from the morality of your ideology.

The argument is pointless and futile.

Farmers don't just Randomly burn their Produce lol @Stern

In RL it could be resolved in physicality.

he will ask evidence of this now

I never claimed otherwise @AdorableStormtrooper

I mean

js

@Aki what ideology am I arguing from?

Comunism.

except I'm not a communist

not even a marxist

Pro Collectivization and Pro Socialist Historical Revisionism

at the very least

Well except you are clarly making moral judgments from that pespective.

I'm pro historical revisionism in general

in favor of a certain ideology

in favor of historical reality

..from an ideologically beneficial point of view

great... "for consitency sake" no genocide happens

grand position

@AdorableStormtrooper ok?

that's not the reason behind it

@Aki ?

history is narrative building, it isn't usually presented completely false

you just hide certain facts

like Holodomor

and they go away from collective memory and discourse