Message from @Bee
Discord ID: 525588841931735043
ima buy an AR tho, and books
```Perón's third term was also marked by an escalating conflict between the Peronist left- and right-wing factions. This turmoil was fueled primarily by calls for repression against the left on the part of leading CGT figures, a growing segment of the armed forces (particularly the navy) and right-wing radicals within his own party, notably Perón's most fascist adviser, José López Rega. López Rega, appointed Minister of Social Welfare, was in practice given power far beyond his purview, soon controlling up to 30 percent of the federal budget.[15] Diverting increasing funds, he formed the Triple A, a death squad that soon began targeting not only the violent left; but moderate opposition, as well.[81] The Montoneros became marginalized in the Peronist movement and were mocked by Perón himself after the Ezeiza massacre. In his speech to the governors on 2 August 1973, Perón openly criticized radical Argentine youth for a lack of political maturity. ```
hmmmm.... 🤔
**Soviet urges intensify**
Alright, well what do you think of everything else, how he improved conditions for the workers and, despite his shortcomings, wages still grew under his rule
why are commies never happy with anything that they are given lol
the price controls, nationalisations and the seeming involvement of unions seem decent
but again
*not the best thing ever*
fake news
> why are commies never happy with anything that they are given lol
because we aren't given gommunizm
so we gotta take it
lol
ok so what do you think of the picture i posted
seems like capitalism to me
wut lol
it seems to still operate on the employer-employee relation
and private ownership
so
nah, its directly with the corporate
people are elected by the people , there are mediators
yeah
why would anyone go for this and not worker-coops
is beyond me
worker-coops are not just cool, they are clearly superior
but this is mainly for bigger industries
i mean its basically a huge coop
Not really. Also, there are shareholders external to the enterprise's labour force
so it can't be a worker-coop
or comparable
except shareholders are on a leash
the financial sector doesn't dominate industry like it does in capitalism
or they are got rid of
like what hitler did
international finance is cancer
yes but worker-coop is defined by
a) only being constituted by the workers of the coop
b) everyone has 1 vote
c) everyone has equal share
so it wouldn't be the same thing imo
i would say coops work on a smaller scale, apart from mondragon, i dunno, they are pretty comparable i think. way more democratic than capitalism
Mondragon shows that they can work on quite large scale
eh Syndicates are better
thats what i meant
i mean syndicalism like the falange and the corporatist state are pretty much the same thing
worker-coop federations would be a good way forward, at least before proper socialism/communism is established at political level
what do you think of small business overall
I think self-employment is totally valid
right.
what about owning one
True socialism is only achieved at the national level