It doesn't even need to be as generally intelligent as humans, no, to be danger

we already have this technology, it's just not in widespread adoption yet

but again we can clearly argue for why relying on AI is the *false step* and commit ourselves to bettering of the species along biological lines and in away that doesn't pose existential danger

to ignore this,

to think you cannot,

would demand that humans are suicidal and have no survival instinct

again, improving general cognitive capacity of human beings

a) lessens reliance on AI
b) makes people more and more aware of all the risks of AI
c) allows people to become more and more *organically minded* as a consequence

```but again we can clearly argue for why relying on AI is the false step and commit ourselves to bettering of the species along biological lines and in away that doesn't pose existential danger```

you will not ween everyone off against buying into mutations (and doing this will be socially acceptable by that time) that seem biologically beneficial to them.

the point is that users will replace non users, always, being more healthy, productive and sexually attractive. and that mutation will become wide spread.

the better people understand the risk landscape facing us in 21st century, very much the better for *our species chances' of survival*

it isn't entirely clear to me how you would argue against this

currently, not many grasp this

the real extent of the challenge ahead

you're not saying anything at this point

@Gerçek why would we want our species' future to be determined by an AI?

I certainly don't

I know very, very few people who do

that is my question to you, fren.

I do not, no

at no stage have I argued for this

that's not how people think.

that's far too long term

Perhaps make people smarter and they will be wiser? Idk??

like

what I propose is a *solution to the problem you posit*

and people will be detatched from the end product, they don't care if the mutation came from a human engineer or an AI, if it's good it's good

dumb humans maybe

by that time again, it will be socially normal to do this.

the objective then would be to heighten our species

when you realize most people vote for instant gratification instead of long term sustainability 😩

Again, it doesn't have to be like that at all

again,

this is literally a problem **only** if you *insist we stay as we are*

the transhumanist movement needs to be defeated yes

I agree

this

"let AI live in the minds of every single one of us" type of charlatan

this needs to be defeated

but that has no connection to what I propose

you can do that with literally every problem posed by anything in the world, *it's only a problem if you insist we stay as we are*

even this tech you're talking about has some constraints mate

your a Utopian individual 😄

I mean what is your solution then? Do not improve the intelligence levels of humans as they venture into this landmark century with all the perils *you clearly are aware exist?*