Message from @Gerçek
Discord ID: 528216141060112394
you can still wanna live
Why do the emotions matter
i meant that medically
if you are disabled say
I mean Huff there's no real clear answer to any of these questions. We all have our opinions on these matters and our opinions are probably in large part determined by our particular conditions and life history. There very likely isn't going to be an objective standard to be found for the questions you ask.
So there is no objective standard
For questions dependent on subjects' conditions of life, yes
Good
The want of a system where there is freedom for individuals comes from a subjective standard
It does, yes
Tell me what you guys think about this... One needs their *freedoms* to fulfill their *responsibilities*.
No, not really
One has freedoms, and responsibilities, and both overlap here and there but not in all areas
You have *freedom* so you can for example Articulate your Thoughts and convince the Society against a Hole that you see in the Future we might fall into.
That's why you have Freedom of Speech
for example
Well yes, freedom is important in that you can not only help yourself in reaching goals and avoiding pitfalls, but to help others in this way also
If you are robbed of freedom, you can do neither
Of course its built into us, the desire for freedom - the more degrees of freedom an organism has, the better for its chances of survival. In this sense, our desire for freedom has an objective basis.
Yes, you have certain responsibilities towards yourself and your family as well, so we have Freedom of Religion.. so you can fulfill your duties towards your God
Freedoms exist so that you are allowed a Space to fulfill your duties and responsibilities, to yourself, your family and your society.
Well yes but not just that, but also your aspirations
Its not solely about duties
nor solely about aspirations
like in most things, there's a dialectic between the two; one bleeds into another, and they produce synthesis
Your aspirations should ideally be actually good for yourself, your family and your society... shouldn't they?
also i don't agree at all with the statement, more freedom an individual organism has the better it's chances of survival.. that's just not true in any sense
Aspirations usually are by default in the interest of the subject, and in cases they aren't I think its often the case that something is wrong with the brain of the individual, there's mental illness, perhaps a brain tumour etc. when self-harming
You have all the freedom to build yourself up *and* to destroy yourself.
It really matters what you do with it..
```Aspirations usually are by default in the interest of the subject, and in cases they aren't I think its often the case that something is wrong with the brain of the individual, there's mental illness, perhaps a brain tumour etc. when self-harming```
nah man, it happens all the time.. we think we want something.. we try.. we get it.. and then we're like.. meh..
it's hard to know what is actually good for us and what will satisfy us, it's not as easy and not everyone is able to figure it out by themselves.
> also i don't agree at all with the statement, more freedom an individual organism has the better it's chances of survival.. that's just not true in any sense
The degrees of freedom translate to greater number of pastures to feed in, more options to hide from predators, more pathways to escape should a predator pursue you; in social context degrees of freedom might translate to number of the population and thereby potential mates, etc.
Certainly the opposite is true at least,
that is,
the less degrees of freedom, the worse
not on an individual basis.
i won't totally discard Parentalism (i think that's what it's called)
> it's hard to know what is actually good for us and what will satisfy us, it's not as easy and not everyone is able to figure it out by themselves.
I don't think anyone figures it out by themselves
the more freedom you have, not only the more options you have to succeed
the more options you have to fuckup