Message from @Spookaswa
Discord ID: 528414242999631873
If you consider that all siegefags and larpers are natsoc, you're not entirely wrong
Especially the ones out of Scandinavia and Germany
Lol
Strasserist Germany when
Im not a siege fan
The person that wrote that was a convicted pedo
Read it
Read Mein Kampf and Hitler's second book
I remember reading the first pages, then I saw its really bad optics and gave up on it
I'm not really a fan of the modern fascist literature
Lol what a liberal
What's the point of reading it?
There's already plenty of material
Like MK
The Doctrine of Fascism
No More Hunger
Tomorrow we Live
Why wouldnβt you read a meme of a book?
For my Legionnaires
etc.
The Ironmarch fags are trying to make Fascism some mythical entity instead of what it is
π¦
Muh universal truth
Everything that I don't agree with is a falsehood
!!!
Its so utopian its retarded
Besides most of the books are just rants about how shitty the Alt Right is and that we shouldn't make alliances with others
Their only redeeming quality is that they aren't as shit as the SIEGEfags
hi
Utopia is a false concept.
it is an ideal akin to balancing a pencil on its tip.
the enemy of good ideas is striving for a perfect idea.
I mean, the idea is such a hilarious parody of itself.
for example, the book where the word utopia comes from as its namesake, beleived that slavery was a necessity and fully incorperated it.
Utopia is just a profanity for an idea you judge impossible. Yet striving for the impossible is ideal. Many things were impossible until someone succeeded. And lacking an objective will make you decay.
It's on the journey towards the unknown that you find the barriers of truth with which you can base a feasible goal
Well yes, striving for the ideal is something that, in fact, helps prevent you from collapsing to the antithesis of the ideal. The world is constantly changing, entropy is constantly increasing and just about the only thing that can hold things together in human relations is striving towards an ideal. To put it in terms of systemspeak, if the network isn't evolving around a specific goal or aim, it falls apart - the thing holding it together is that goal or imperative.
<#507040801860091914> Any circumstance is justified, just be fucking prepared when they strike back, fuck the international law, just be prepared for other countries to strike back in the name of maintaining "peace"
@Xinyue holding to false goals and imperitives can prove just as destructive as persuing nothing.
Again, i think this is the wrong angle of thinking. we should not follow βgoals.β