Message from @Bearer Of The Curse

Discord ID: 529167372330991616


2018-12-31 05:10:29 UTC  

Xi Jinping is a great leader

2018-12-31 05:11:09 UTC  

I mean

2018-12-31 05:11:32 UTC  

humans DONT conceive the tiling problem.

2018-12-31 05:11:35 UTC  

we cut corners.

2018-12-31 05:11:41 UTC  

its a generalization.

2018-12-31 05:11:59 UTC  

thats not a problem of computation, we arent literally computing the infinite tiling problem.

2018-12-31 05:12:03 UTC  

our minds just dismiss it.

2018-12-31 05:12:29 UTC  

it takes the principles we know are true, and we just continue to assume its true.

2018-12-31 05:12:38 UTC  

thats computable my dude.

2018-12-31 05:14:34 UTC  

There are arguments beyond those that Penrose makes though about the problem of transferability of the mind to a machine, which have to do with the

a) historical
b) dynamic
c) totalising

aspects of the brain. Scale put aside (which silicon computers can't even begin to address yet), the brain is a dynamic entity which evolves in time and in totalised form. There's no clear way to transform something like this, over to a completely different substrate. Further, there are aspects of chemistry and physics to consider here which aren't yet thought out to a degree that could even begin to approach a satisfying answer. So at the very least you should consider that its certainly not a done deal yet and that ultimately we aren't sure *what* will emerge out of this technological trajectory.

And again, watch the video if you want *a better presentation* of it than what I gave. There's active debate about this, and Penrose is after all a mathematician as well as a physicist. He can deliver the point home better than I can, seeing how I'm *neither.*

2018-12-31 05:16:49 UTC  

Well, yes. thats obvious. if we are trying to replicate organic processes you are going to have to compute on a level of detail that is incomprehensible to us.

however, that does not make it impossible, and it does not mean that computer intelligence has to be created in a similar way to us.

2018-12-31 05:17:19 UTC  

We have already created working models of worm nervous systems.

2018-12-31 05:17:22 UTC  

🤷‍♂️

2018-12-31 05:18:59 UTC  

and i can hardly see why banning general intelligence for safety concerns will address any problems we conceive of.

theoretically, literally anyone could create a general intelligence if they had the time and resources.

2018-12-31 05:19:39 UTC  

are you really oyveying me.

2018-12-31 05:20:29 UTC  

> literally anyone could create a general intelligence if they had the time and resources.

Which are absolutely vast in question. Resources? What resources? How much energy production? How much processing power? How much memory capacity? How much cooling is needed for this? There are a shit ton of limitations present here I think that are not often accounted for. Its not like building something in your garage, I think.

2018-12-31 05:21:03 UTC  

Think outside the box man.

2018-12-31 05:21:14 UTC  

intelligence is just a bunch of dumb things working together.

2018-12-31 05:21:43 UTC  

theoretically someone could create an evolving virus, infecting computers to use their computational power to build a more intelligent gestalt.

2018-12-31 05:21:55 UTC  

And thats just what I can think of.

2018-12-31 05:22:13 UTC  

Synthetics and synthetic lovers are unwelcome in the ecofash state

2018-12-31 05:22:54 UTC  

Considering we don't actually have a clear *theory* on the way the brain works, only glimpses of it - hell, we discover new sub-regions of the brain rather frequently - and much less for what creativity, intelligence, emotion, etc. are in actual fact or how all the processes associated with these fields of experience work, you can't say that intelligence is just a bunch of dumb things working together. You quite literally can't make this statement, nobody can. Nor can I claim the contrary; we quite literally don't know.

2018-12-31 05:22:55 UTC  

@Bearer Of The Curse objectively bluepilled. real ecofash want to spread life across the universe, the synthetic revolution is just a necessary step to take life and lift it into the stars.

2018-12-31 05:23:21 UTC  

“hurr durr i want to live and die on this rock and accomplish nothing”

2018-12-31 05:23:34 UTC  

The nose grows every time you talk

2018-12-31 05:23:56 UTC  

okay pagan

2018-12-31 05:23:58 UTC  

Synthetic revolution is not necessary to take us to the stars actually

2018-12-31 05:24:00 UTC  

objectively false

2018-12-31 05:24:26 UTC  

Humanity is not the end of evolution.

2018-12-31 05:24:35 UTC  

you underestimate the power of nature.

2018-12-31 05:24:40 UTC  

Being replaced is not evolution

2018-12-31 05:24:55 UTC  

You can literally build a generation starship like mobile O Neill Cylinder type and then have generations live and die there as they are en route to Alpha Centauri, Barnard's Star, etc. Humans can get there just fine as humans.

2018-12-31 05:25:01 UTC  

@Bearer Of The Curse if you think of it like that we are replaced constantly.

2018-12-31 05:25:10 UTC  

sons and daughters replace mothers and fathers.

2018-12-31 05:25:13 UTC  

Absolutely not, our DNA lives on

2018-12-31 05:25:20 UTC  

your cells are completely replaced every ten years or so.

2018-12-31 05:25:34 UTC  

you are theseus’ ship.

2018-12-31 05:25:38 UTC  

The genetic information remains though, its not the same in this sense, no.

2018-12-31 05:25:39 UTC  

and you dont even know it.

2018-12-31 05:25:57 UTC  

@Xinyue genetic information changes constantly.

2018-12-31 05:26:06 UTC  

your skin’s dna is diffirent from your livers.