bs

The other way around

The red army was backed by banks

And the Cheka and NKVD were not Army units

They did nothing but destroy churches and towns

But the red army was subordinate to them

Yes, because they were direct extensions of the party and acted as their enforcers.

In a one-party dictatorial state you’re going to place the official soldiers of your party above the simple army, as the Soviets did.

and they enforced the terror of the checka

More reason to hate them

and the collectivizations

which lead to mass starvation

No reason to hate them here!

I would say Russians just like it rough.

Salus

@Deleted User get a job

hey guys where do i get roles

a

nigboi the fuck are you doing here

anyway go to <#507040923884978176> and do ?ranks

then do ?rank rankname

>"the majority of the public supported whites over reds in the Civil War"

Bold statement to utter while having absolutely no proof. Red Army had like 5 million soldiers at its peak, Whites had 2.5 million. Where's the support?

>The Red Army was supported by banks

The White Army was supported by banks of
UK, Canada, Australia, US, Japan, Greece, China, Romania and so on and so forth.

>Jewish comissars hated russian goyim

When you have to explain the aftermath of hundreds of years of unsuccessful agrarian policies, reactionary regress, lack of industrialization with "uuuh Bolsheviks wer jews and wer bad", you don't exactly know the topic at hand.

As for whether or not Russian people hated the Russian troops, Russian troops *consist* of Russian people.

Only a degenerate, crumbling country would hate their military.

Good point, I'll keep that in mind.

judeobolshevism is a myth

red army supported by banks is a dishonest bend of the truth

@el pebble The bolsheviks, more like the )))Bolsheviks(((

The Mensheviks were Jewish

hot take right here

one second

```Although Jews were active among both the Social Democratic Bolshevik and the Menshevik factions, Jews were more prominent among the Mensheviks. Stalin took note of the ethnic proportions represented on each side, as seen from a 1907 report on the Congress published in the Bakinsky rabochy (Baku Workman), which quoted a coarse joke about "a small pogrom" (погромчик) Stalin attributed to then-Bolshevik Grigory Aleksinsky:

" Not less interesting is the composition of the congress from the standpoint of nationalities. Statistics showed that the majority of the Menshevik faction consists of Jews—and this of course without counting the Bundists—after which came Georgians and then Russians. On the other hand, the overwhelming majority of the Bolshevik faction consists of Russians, after which come Jews—not counting of course the Poles and Letts—and then Georgians, etc. For this reason one of the Bolsheviks observed in jest (it seems Comrade Aleksinsky) that the Mensheviks are a Jewish faction and the Bolsheviks a genuine Russian faction, so it would not be a bad idea for us Bolsheviks to arrange a small pogrom in the party.[2]"
```

@King Leopold II Welcome!

You have entered the den of autism

Ebin

How Nationalist were the old school Socdems? I mean, reading up about them throughout the 20th century there seems to be a clear divide the old and the modern SocDem parties.

But then again, I’m speaking mostly about the Nordic SocDems, dunno about the rest of Europe.

"nationalist" is relative

In what way?

I highly doubt that old school Soc Dems cared about race @megakillerx