Message from @Dibabliow
Discord ID: 688510138071777466
should i buy one <:big_brained:396156349676781569>
u get me
I'm avoiding the public gym now because of wuflu <:virgin:396572545610022914>
@gast we don't that's why its in colleges of arts and not sciences
maybe if you were more gentlemanly, and not some MS-13 hoodlum
"imprecise" is not the same thing as "useless" or "a lie"
@Nerthulas But it is treated as fact. Entire nations are assembled around history, not empirical facts.
history has discourse
why are you complaining
they consider the evidence and formulate theories
Not complaining. Dissenting
if you're talking about nations having conceptions of themselves...
yes, they do
you can't get 'out' of history
just propose better history
I expect nothing more of the jewish controlled state to subvert history to their own advantage.
yes there are bad historians and trends in history
the fact that 'social history' is allowed to exist in academia...
and a lot of historians have agendas
and take too much license
but then again
All historians have agendas
a lot of social scientists do that too
the problem is also rife in social science
all humans have agendas
that zoomer open a loot box or something
History is always laden with a narrative, like art or any form of expression.
it's not as if people are just taking historical writings at face value...
they are contextualizing them
there is argument
it is a fact that x person wrote y in z year
what exactly that means more than that is up for interpretations
and we have more and less likely interpretations
me when i get messi in a pack
<:ahem:639979147782914084>
The primary form of dissent is to start with not agreeing with their history. Any counter ideas and narratives are layered upon a counter history.
like what
and I mean within the field of history