here, this thread is for you @Medman
https://twitter.com/BenBraddock67/status/1215096790371971073

gotta get that big back 😜

do you have any sort of bar you can do pull ups on?

@Str3tch based but did u just get my tag wrong

https://scoobysworkshop.com/2012/07/29/100-places-to-do-pullups/

no

Does anyone know why we regard History as empirical, yet it is not a science and more likely a lie?

i guess. too many medmans

should i buy one <:big_brained:396156349676781569>

@Str3tch the system doesn't like latins so i get banned

u get me

I'm avoiding the public gym now because of wuflu <:virgin:396572545610022914>

@gast we don't that's why its in colleges of arts and not sciences

maybe if you were more gentlemanly, and not some MS-13 hoodlum

@Medman GIGACHIN

"imprecise" is not the same thing as "useless" or "a lie"

@Nerthulas But it is treated as fact. Entire nations are assembled around history, not empirical facts.

history has discourse

why are you complaining

they consider the evidence and formulate theories

Not complaining. Dissenting

if you're talking about nations having conceptions of themselves...

yes, they do

you can't get 'out' of history

just propose better history

I expect nothing more of the jewish controlled state to subvert history to their own advantage.

yes there are bad historians and trends in history

the fact that 'social history' is allowed to exist in academia...

tfw the earth is hollow

and a lot of historians have agendas

and take too much license

but then again

All historians have agendas

a lot of social scientists do that too

the problem is also rife in social science

all humans have agendas

that zoomer open a loot box or something

History is always laden with a narrative, like art or any form of expression.

it's not as if people are just taking historical writings at face value...

they are contextualizing them

there is argument