history has discourse

why are you complaining

they consider the evidence and formulate theories

Not complaining. Dissenting

if you're talking about nations having conceptions of themselves...

yes, they do

you can't get 'out' of history

just propose better history

I expect nothing more of the jewish controlled state to subvert history to their own advantage.

yes there are bad historians and trends in history

the fact that 'social history' is allowed to exist in academia...

tfw the earth is hollow

and a lot of historians have agendas

and take too much license

but then again

All historians have agendas

a lot of social scientists do that too

the problem is also rife in social science

all humans have agendas

that zoomer open a loot box or something

History is always laden with a narrative, like art or any form of expression.

it's not as if people are just taking historical writings at face value...

they are contextualizing them

there is argument

it is a fact that x person wrote y in z year

what exactly that means more than that is up for interpretations

and we have more and less likely interpretations

me when i get messi in a pack

<:ahem:639979147782914084>

The primary form of dissent is to start with not agreeing with their history. Any counter ideas and narratives are layered upon a counter history.

like what

and I mean within the field of history

but if you can do it better, by all means do so

I don't doubt that you could do it better than many

The formation of Europe and any of its early wars from the fall of Western Rome and the subversion of history from then.

We should look more closely at what really happened

is this about that conversation I had with those guys earlier?

Primary sources

i wish that guy could get as excited about dating a girl as he does with a new flavor of soy

who are you?

are you a regular user?