Message from @VladTheImploded

Discord ID: 675331827174473758


2020-02-05 01:21:18 UTC  

and they were arguing over whether an executive order is really law or not...

2020-02-05 01:21:42 UTC  

>but technically executive orders aren't law! The President can't write laws therefore he's not a king!

2020-02-06 02:46:55 UTC  

AOC Skipping the SOTU was actually a brilliant move. She takes a little bit of flak in the short term, but avoids all the video clips of her not applauding something good (like the rest of the white suit wearing - *totally not kkk* mafia) that the rest of her peers will have to live down come election season.

2020-02-06 04:46:06 UTC  

What difference does it make, she's not even going to be up for reelection.

2020-02-06 04:53:32 UTC  

Yeah aren't they planning on removing her district?

2020-02-06 04:53:51 UTC  

AOC is in the Klan...?

2020-02-06 04:54:04 UTC  

I think yoh may be confused.

2020-02-06 20:11:03 UTC  

--warn @Nyaboron civility/off topic

2020-02-06 20:11:03 UTC  

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Nyaboron#0346 has been warned.***

2020-02-06 20:12:30 UTC  

fuk u

2020-02-06 20:12:49 UTC  

I shall unleash a jihad of white thots to ruin you

2020-02-06 20:20:00 UTC  

--warn @Nyaboron civility/off topic

2020-02-06 20:20:01 UTC  

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Nyaboron#0346 has been warned.***

2020-02-06 20:54:33 UTC  

they have been unleashed

2020-02-07 13:21:43 UTC  

historically when democrats show up dressed in all white, more often than not it's a klan meeting lol. it's a metaphor, i know they aren't actually klan members

2020-02-07 13:24:10 UTC  

The first sentence of that post is empirically incorrect.

2020-02-07 13:24:49 UTC  

And I kind of figured you didn't think they were literal klan members.

2020-02-07 13:25:24 UTC  

I just don't understand the connection. That's what I'm trying to suss out

2020-02-07 13:26:01 UTC  

Was it merely wearing white and an association of "Southern man bad"?

2020-02-07 13:27:01 UTC  

i think you're focusing too much on a stray comment

2020-02-07 13:27:34 UTC  

as the kids say, "it's not that deep fam"

2020-02-07 13:28:52 UTC  

the debate point was that skipping the speech was a brilliant move for future reelection efforts

2020-02-07 13:31:02 UTC  

Gotcha. I disagree.

2020-02-07 13:31:53 UTC  

And I think statements like that deserve to be focused on. Using slurs like that is anti-white and classist.

2020-02-07 13:32:59 UTC  

if anything, it's anti-white suits, and fashionist.

2020-02-07 13:35:21 UTC  

No.

2020-02-07 13:36:55 UTC  

your debate style is unparalleled in this <#586033832277442590> channel lol. No.

2020-02-07 13:39:42 UTC  

Your statement wasn't serious, so it didn't warrant a serious response.

2020-02-07 13:40:31 UTC  

No.

2020-02-07 13:41:16 UTC  

and because i'm not a hypocrite, i'll explain

2020-02-07 13:41:34 UTC  

You can mock not engaging with tripe, but the reality is, all you're doing is showing yourself to be disingenuous and not a very deep thinker.

2020-02-07 13:41:35 UTC  

My statement about white suits had nothing to do with race or class

2020-02-07 13:41:41 UTC  

You are tho...

2020-02-07 13:42:47 UTC  

*sigh* Yes, that insult very clearly is explicitly tied to poor whites.

2020-02-07 13:42:59 UTC  

how?

2020-02-07 13:43:31 UTC  

You can pretend there were lots of rich blacks in the Klan, but you're just looking more disingenuous than before.

2020-02-07 13:43:43 UTC  

especially when it was presumably rich democrats, representatives, that i was specifically talking about

2020-02-07 13:44:18 UTC  

i think maybe you should go re-read what i originally typed because your interpretations are way off base

2020-02-07 13:45:20 UTC  

You seem to be misunderstanding...

2020-02-07 13:45:21 UTC  

unless, of course, i'm the one making a mistake by taking anything you type to be genuine conversation?

2020-02-07 13:45:40 UTC  

I said the insult, not the subject of the insult.