😎

Look at the map

Misss spell'n , not a problem

people have pulled hidden images out of q posts?

is this true?

@Anythingbutlatefordinner

yes

@AboveCosmic check out steg channel

ok

thats what we been doing

i have been awasy

away

Sniper did you get the link you were asking for on Dtube for Dustin

If not I have it.

TY

Any time

https://youtu.be/BT3v14tcoF8

new stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtNhbvXGWmE Anti-school is on youtube

https://youtu.be/T2Pu9qkIo9w

https://youtu.be/NvrK3XrNep8

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5087/text

the vid on B. Fulford imo is worth viewing having followed him for over a year now, however

like many vids, this is a re-run. Benjamin has visibly aged since this and it shows how long these background out of sight shenanigans have been going on

This is displayed published Feb. 8, but it is circa 4-5 years old

I have an idea about reading Q. He asks "Why" questions that have substance and then follows them with a simple "Why?" Here is a possibility. We see something like, "Why is SR back in the news? Why?" My idea is that the second "Why?" is not merely a repeat emphasis on the previous question. It could be. My idea is that it the second, "Why?" is directed at the answer to the previous question. So, the template would look something like this. We read, "Why xzy? Why?" It's intended to be thought through like this--> Q: Why xyz? A: Xyz is happening so because of abc. Q: Why is abc happening?] (I wish we could make paragraphs in these posts.) If I'm correct, then this is to get us to think through things and their interconnections. I've noticed a striking lack of ability for people to think systematically. We've had 3 generations in the US of people shunning math and unable to understand their own first language. (It's not just grammar, but SYNTAX. Have you heard people say, "for all intensive purposes"? They're putting bad sound-alike words on a phrase they don't understand, "for all intents and purposes." This is done to sound forceful or intelligent, but shows you're an idiot when you mung it up. Another example is, "based off of," versus the logical & proper, "based on." You have a basis. Other things are ON that basis, not "off of" it.) Q started this by making declarations mixed with Socratic method teaching. He's likely doing the same thing now. Why A? Because of B. Ok, and why B?

Why is SR back in the news? Seth Rich has come up because the public needs to be reminded. Why? Because the public needs to understand the real evil of the people to be arrested when the time comes. Why? Because otherwise they will accuse the arrests of being merely political and unjustified. The public perception matters as much as the truth nowadays, a.k.a. "narrative."

NEW STEG ON Q IMAGE FROM NEW POSTS

Gadling Time, what a Great point. I guess being 61, I can totally agree about education since I was in school. And I believe your logic when reading the Q messages, makes absolute sense. I love that commentary.

Check out this app.from American Intelligence Media https://apple.co/2nGlc2T http://bit.ly/2nGfyNX. These guys and Gals are fantastic. If you are not following them, I highly recommend you do.

What is BOOM, perhaps our voice, loud and clear - assert and publicize the conservative truth.

hmm interesting

@jac6969#6697 absolutely agree and same with DJT slam of IG

think he was taken out by... wh's?

@Romans 6

Pence is the second bridge here’s his book jimmy kimmel threatened him with it at the oscars most likely to activate him his going to take the wh from trump mark my words

Or he’s gonna be accused of being a pedo and make christens look bad the elite work like that

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nflTu_8wyPs&feature=push-u-sub&attr_tag=Ys0Y4DQyZeOCTSLL-6