WakeUP!, it's Michael, not Micheal. It's the same as Rachael, Nathaniel, and Daniel. See your search string and earlier post.

I see good stuff on this thread. For our encouragement: Look up prayer in Greek & Hebrew. It means to petition, or to ask for stuff or favor, especially from an authority. Remember, we are not The Jedi. We do not "feel God" like He was the Force. We ask things of our sovereign God. Those who "Decree and Declare" are not expressing faith, but are behaving as magicians. They practice a form of witchcraft disguised in misused Christian terms. Do not give them money, EVER. They mislead people away from Faith (trust) in Christ for forgiveness, and redirect people to faith in one's own words--as prisoners to positivism (Osteen, Meyers, P White, Jakes, etc). In reality, our Father hears our petitions. He cares about us. If we die, we have nothing to worry about in the afterlife, in the new creation. Tell Him your woes, your desires, and trust Him at His word (Word) that he has forgiven your sins & knows what is best for us, individually. He did not promise to make this world, which is passing away, into a paradise. Still, pray to Him in this current fight against evil. Ask him to give wisdom to our elected officials. Ask Him to protect our President, the cabinet, and the staff from undue influence. Thank Him for the forgiveness He gives us.

"Human nature is very easy to predict, especially when these people are stupid and backed into a corner." Hrmmm "Backed into corner" = will lash out. How with they lash out? "Stupid" = doing the same things, the same tactics as always, but more intensely, frequently, faster. Thus, more frequent shock-news of shootings or other events, accusations toward the President, etc.

@mr.mark Agreed. Thankfully, too.

@Hapcamper1 😃 1John4:4, who is "them" in that verse? (I ask with a smile cuz it agrees with what I posted earlier today.)

@Maga gal Were are you hearing that water is going to be poisoned? I heard HooliganMonsoon reading a piece from a defected Russian talking about how if the Cold War had turned into a war, then poisoning the Patomic river was something they had in mind. My 2p is that this can be done as an industrial event, rather than a plain poisoning. The only thing making that a concern for the future is that "they" keep running the same playbook. Where are you hearing this from?

@lmbd Q's board is gone. Other posts are gone. Some Trump tweets are gone. Re-prints of Q posts are still around, e.g. www.qanonposts.com

@Saintlady9 There's one problem in that video. (For all to read here...) I've noticed that among us conspiracy watchers, there's a certain anti-Jewish sentiment that floats through from time to time. I think it's because the Rothschilds were Jewish. We've taken that to be a smear on all Jews,, by ethnicity or by faith, as if the evils of one person (family) belong to the larger group. In reality, the evil has nothing to do with Judaism nor the ethnicity. The fact that people who are at minimum ethnically Jewish are present in a particular field (e.g. Hollywood) does not BY ITSELF indicate a "Jewish conspiracy." We can have conspiracy without Jews, too. Back to the video. He says that the SPLC is Pro-Jewish. That's a sneaky synonym for Zionist. Zionists are a problem, but are not necessarily Jewish. In fact, Zionism does not line up with the state of Israel itself. This is no defense of the SPLC. They are a scourge. Let's be critical of the SPLC where it's accurate. The SPLC is seomewhat anti-Jewish or, at minimum, has no problem calling out the Jewish Defense League for alleged misdeeds. https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/jewish-defense-league There are other examples of the SPLC blacklisting actual Jewish or Pro-Jew organizations.

@Romans 6 Just woke up...fell asleep after posting earlier. Thanks for the PDF. I'll check it out. I hope it not 50% bad info like I've read before.. Annnd as I scroll down this thread... (thread, not the PDF)... all I can say is "that escalated quickly." Geeze, all you did was ask the guy for a calm explanation.

@Saintlady9 I might understand your reply if you used punctuation, proper punctuation at that, regular capitalization, etc. If you want people to read your posts, make then readable. It helps to be able to see where one sentence ends and another begins.

@Romans 6 I'm starting in on the PDF. The definitions of Zionism you give aren't the only positions people can take, but they are useful. I didn't realize English was your second language. The first page took me a bit to get through. This document needs some strong proofreading in order to make it smooth. For example, when the definitions are written in first person after your introduction is in first person, it doesn't strike the reader as a definition. Instead, the reader will mistake it for being your position until they get to the second definition. Objective writing will help. There are those who believe Israel can exist as a state, but it isn't the same as Zionism. Also, your definitions have everything to do with basic politics. The supposed Zionism I don't see here is the "Global conspiracy for Jews to rule from Israel" type that some people worry about. I'll have time later to get further into the document after I eat and come back from a class. Maybe that stuff is down further. 😃 Thanks for the effort. I'm leaving your document open on my computer while I go to class. (I'm not a college student. It's a gym class.)

I had to make an edit!!! Sorry

Ok, I'll understand better when I finish reading it.

@Gary If you mean a spat between SniperLyfe and me, no. I had said something earlier about being careful not to mislabel the SPLC as pro-jew, responding to someone else's video post. I babbled a bit about lumping all Jews into various conspiracy theories, as opposed to facts. So, while I was napping, SniperLyfe gave me his reading material 😃 If you mean some other stupidity that was going on earlier, that stuff was lame. Someone started name-calling SL with no basis. SL keeps posting, so I gotta rewind and read before I leave for class. Nighty night, guys.

@Romans 6 "And ofc it has everything to do with politic" I meant basic, non-conspiracy politics, but I understand your reply anyway.

@Romans 6 Got the new PDF file. Thank you. Some of your posts are a little tough. Their brevity helps. Don't follow the common on-line form of putting commas where periods belong and omitting all other commas.

* posts = here on discord, not in the document.

What is your first language?

Woah! Look at the time! I got more reading done, but now I gotta go! Class in 15 mins.

On Soros and voting machines: Let's remember how people work in general. Soros owns or has a large shareholding stake in certain companies. The voting machines are somewhere down the tree from there. If you want them manipulated, you can't just tell everyone in the company/-ies. You need people who are like-minded, and they have to implement it in a way that is not easily detected by others in the company. It's not as if Soros himself talks to every employee and they're all in on "it." When we talk in ways that sound like every employee would be in on "it," that puts up barriers and prevents red-pilling others. Also, we can't believe something just because we like it along the lines of "our team." For example, some don't want to believe the recent allegations against Roy Moore, but are willing to swiftly willing to believe the teenager-affair-abortion allegations against Sheriff Israel. We have to keep the same standard for people on both sides. If we jump at whatever we favor in the name of good-guy/bad-guy my-team versus them without questioning the sources of these rumours, then we loose all credibility and, again, prevent people from believing us. Use good language skills, a touch of skepticism, and put pieces of evidence together in coherent fashion RATHER than leaping to a conclusion, and your blue-pill or neutral audience will respect your information better.

This DADAIZMO’Samizdata guy is still around. Based on others' posts, I get the idea he was making a mess. He was doing weird name-calling over in Documents earlier today. Now he's in Strategies. Who's an admin?

If you heard there was a porn attack on qanonposts.com, then either the attack has finished OR it's based on javascript from bnserving.com. I have those DISabled. The scripts I have ENabled for that site are everything on the base URL name (qanonposts.com) and cdn.jsdelivr.net. I had no interference. The cdn.jsdelivr.net scripts are needed in order to load the pictures. If you disable that, you'll have links instead. I don't know who maintains that site. If this was actually pointed at Q-related things and not a run-of-the-mill malware on a server in a site hosting farm, then either it's over or depends on certain scripts.

(I owe someone here a reply. I've been busy all weekend. Will get back to you. I may do some editing.) Hello, all. I'm angry. I just listened to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C7mL6oOZFo 😡 It's about Steven Spielberg and Hollywood pedophilia. This Discord chat isn't a dumping ground for just anything we want to talk about. Q told us long ago, way at the beginning, to sit back and enjoy the show. (That doesn't mesh well with being told how important we all are, but straightening that out is for another day.) I have a lot of hope in the 18K sealed indictments an the Dec20th EO. I hope the Human Rights Abuses applies to pedophiles, especially those who organize and procure. If this all plays out, I would love to see the Hollywood Elite be arrested the same as those who smuggle kidnapping victims through Thailand into prostitution. It's not about watching the world burn, but we can hope they put laser guidance onto Hellfire missiles. What's this called, when you pray for just (righteous) harm on another? Omprecatory prayer? Join me. (Originally mis-posted in General)

I have an idea about reading Q. He asks "Why" questions that have substance and then follows them with a simple "Why?" Here is a possibility. We see something like, "Why is SR back in the news? Why?" My idea is that the second "Why?" is not merely a repeat emphasis on the previous question. It could be. My idea is that it the second, "Why?" is directed at the answer to the previous question. So, the template would look something like this. We read, "Why xzy? Why?" It's intended to be thought through like this--> Q: Why xyz? A: Xyz is happening so because of abc. Q: Why is abc happening?] (I wish we could make paragraphs in these posts.) If I'm correct, then this is to get us to think through things and their interconnections. I've noticed a striking lack of ability for people to think systematically. We've had 3 generations in the US of people shunning math and unable to understand their own first language. (It's not just grammar, but SYNTAX. Have you heard people say, "for all intensive purposes"? They're putting bad sound-alike words on a phrase they don't understand, "for all intents and purposes." This is done to sound forceful or intelligent, but shows you're an idiot when you mung it up. Another example is, "based off of," versus the logical & proper, "based on." You have a basis. Other things are ON that basis, not "off of" it.) Q started this by making declarations mixed with Socratic method teaching. He's likely doing the same thing now. Why A? Because of B. Ok, and why B?

Why is SR back in the news? Seth Rich has come up because the public needs to be reminded. Why? Because the public needs to understand the real evil of the people to be arrested when the time comes. Why? Because otherwise they will accuse the arrests of being merely political and unjustified. The public perception matters as much as the truth nowadays, a.k.a. "narrative."

Try turning your phone sideways before taking a screen shot. Besides, you're trying to post one that's already on here.

Also, try uploading the file instead of the screenshot of the file.

Hello, just ducking in real quick again with a post I keep forgetting to put up. Please file this under Steganography. 1) I really want to learn steganography, so thank you to whoever was starting the thread. 2) Has anyone tried to decode a message from the photograph of the cloudy sky that Q posted on 16Feb? https://qanonposts.com/images/c1a98bb6fc1779c51b784311f891229785663f9b07163a478cc03f0267b32e0a.png When I saw the Steganography category, I immediately thought of that image. Where would we get the key to it if there is anything there? 3) Sorry to put this in General, but I don't have permissions to post in the correct category.

@LaserTrain Regarding steganography and that one image, you said you looked already. Then you asked if I use an iPad or an iPhone. Woah! 😜 "Expand your thinking." Haha, just teasing. Among the variety of things I can use, I use a desktop computer.

@Anyone I have questions about this photo. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/413932180926889986/420645292535316512/DVi9AufU0AEiLcE.jpeg 1) Is it real? 2) I think that's a printout of Q posts based on some of the images. If not, then at closest, it's posts from those who interact around Q, like 8chan.net/qresearch or /pol/. Is that right? Can somone clarify? 3) Who is the guy pointing at the printout on the wall?

@PeacefulAnon While it was a good board for a while, it really turned into an unfocused cesspool of really bad thinking-adding up evidence poorly, standing too solidly on conjecture, people interpreting Q not as a decode but in any way possible to push their favorite ideas/topics, ...things like that. It was improving again after about a week-long low. It's disappointing that it didn't get to improve more.

THis isn't quite so Q-ish, but we could use some Katie Perry memes. I'm looking for something like, "Katie Perry is the new Harvey Weinstein" or "I won't respect the limits of your consent. Kiss me on the cheek."

@Mystery Lady Try to track him down and send him a message. Ask that he breaks his presentations into separate videos by topic. Nemos does this. Q's are one set of vids, MAGA updates are another, and his health & nutrition are separate. Sometimes he'll give mention to something from another category, but only when really necessary. Ask AD if he can do the same.