Message from @SledgeHammer
Discord ID: 302169434808909826
I agree
It's that they couldn't manage it alone
And that's why the current system will do if we just keep hunting and culling them, perhaps a bit harder than what we're seeing now. But keep them managed.
You need owls, wolves, birds, snakes etc
Yup
Humans are hunting animals also, we can hunt too.
To keep rabbits and mice in check
Balance is way too finicky
@Accipiter putting on my fedora here, but I think it would be better if we just had natural ecosystems that we didn't manage at all, and just built fences around cities, and strictly enforced these borders and made it illegal to build anything outside of the borders
that would keep cities from getting too sprawled
improve efficiency
and help the environemtn
Animals would go extinct
my ideal future is walkable cities and people working in shops directly underneath where they live
@SledgeHammer what do you mean
Wtf drugs are you on
n/a
I dont get it what did I say that you disagree with
Animals will go exticy
They will die
uh
Uh what?
You think only humans can cause an animals extinction
I think pandas reproduce in the wild, just not in captivity
>not keeping a few africans alive in a zoo
@Accipiter fascism
It's happened to themselves in the past
Pandas generally have trouble reproducing
You got a point with that lad
yes, the old way of how work, home and civic/religious were organized is best @Convo
Like I agree with you making africa a low meddling nature zone
Whites are capable of pretty much anything. And nature in general with excel under White rule
But you will have animals go extinct
@SledgeHammer yeah that's fine, I don't mind that much
if little fishies go extinct because they can't compete with a nearby fish, I don't care enough to interfere. Unless it's a foreign invasive species or something, in which case yeah genocide the invaders.
But now you can study that animal
To a ultra high degree
Or it's biology
Some features of which can be beneficial to mankind