Message from @Noah Problemo
Discord ID: 429428186275643393
Gold value would basically follow this: Price of gold = Quantity of money / quntity of gold. If less gold is on hand than estimated, the value in gold rpive would be HIHGER. So, a "Long Gold" position would be used
No
I'm not going to listen to them. I went over there to see a comment on their YT site. The comments were hammering them. Withering criticism was everywhere
When they starting callin Q anitsemetic that was when I had enough. ridiculous claim. And Im aware of this tactic.
Q clearance is a designation within the intel community, has an established meaning. Q even joked when shown an image of a coffee cup taken in some base
Part of the problem may be the QuEST for clicks
either inserts, or blackmailed or bribed in my opinion
Could be. Lot's of ways to ingratiate with online persons. I'd personally try donating heavily through their Patreon, then get to know them, and then influence
How ever they got to this point, their tactics are obvious, its obvious they have not been in the diss-info arena for long. they seemes hurried and panicked to me. So they are compromised in my opinon and nothing they say should be taken at face value.
@LmofGOD Obviously Uranium One is what it is. There is credible information out that the process of CFIUS approval was not followed dilligently. Also evidence of credible nature exists that various parites around the globe, especially including Australia and Russia were working very hard on this deal. Uranium is not only a fuel for Utility company reactors but an important precursor (needs enrichment to high level) for nuclear weapons. Thus emerging powers look to obtain this material
Dunno.
Someone else may have an idea
There is so much info on the net stating that Obama was found guilty and his appeal denied and he has to pay back the money he sent to Iran and there are almost as many sites stating it is not true. Does anyone know what the truth is? Thank you.
@OneWing. Interesting, except just having a lot of traffic on something, ALONE is not amounting to proof. There are bursts of mis-information which light up for a while and then die out.
A POTUS would not normally incur Personal Liability (personally owe money) for actions done during office.
Example; Nixon did not have to personally pay $$. Clinton was not facing bankruptcy, but removal from office
@Dvorak8 thanks, that is what I thought too. I really want to be responsible for what I pass on and not end up being used to pass misinformation. Really appreciate your reply. 😃
Sure. We get stuff in here that is speculative. Probably no problemo. I used to be auditor, accountant, etc. So, I try and vett sauce before contributing, but I tend to post web stuff pretty quickly sometimes. The legal aspects are especially tough to suss out sometimes.
@everyone PLease make an avatar, also think before you write somthing, make sure the thought is clear so that others can understand. Please try to craft well written statements in text chat. Thank you. dont forget to make youself an avatar.
Info Wars is controlled opposition.
Is there a link to watch it?
ok thank you
@Romans 6 done 👍
@Romans 6 Hooray for our side, I finally got an avatar, now I’m somebody!
And no need to interview, if they want you the men in black will drop by in the night and escort you to your desk.
Curious if anyone has ran across the actual link to the FOIA permit on that March For Our Lives gun grab planned months prior? I keep seeing the graphic, but nothing solid to verify it.
@Saber-tooth can you give link? I’ve looked using info and can’t find anything. Thx!
I wonder if they are waiting for Easter to pass. Not that I see any significance, but Easter and Christmas still hold some force as social markers
hello
It’s Twitter. We can’t give links here- sorry.
We can put links in “research-open”, but I don’t have link open now.
Whats the new Q anon map/board web address going to be? or is the old one being merged/miggrated to a new site or ???
@SirW00f memes go in meme room...
Beam 'em up Scotty?
Also thanks to Mandela Effect, that line was never spoken in Star Trek @della4
Thanks to failing human memory rather...
@new name If it was just one person or a few persons, I would agree but it isn't.