US treasury will issue gold-backed currency, no mre Fed.

This is why gold prices have been kept low, so china and russia could have the gold they need. Equal playing field

Right @Earleebird that's quoted from the Guttierez comment. Efforts to move ahead with a PetroYuan are under way, and Deutsche Bank is under pressure, so having trouble there makes sense, also I believe may even have been referenced in Q items. The concept is a return, by USA to gold. Thinking that through, and following markets like I do, there is not even a very solid consensus on how much gold is stored in USA vaults. Having spent a lot of time around large banks, securities regulators, etc. This sort of change would be complex in extreme

@everyone please note, it is just not polite to post random link while people are in the middle of having a conversation. Please observe text etiquette

I hope we do go to gold, because I told my boss yesterday we are haha, so far havnt been wrong yet. but I said it would be by end of year. maybe thts too soon

Are we OK, Xeno? Thought main topic was return to Gold Standard

you ok was talking to someone else, carry on friends

Yes. Benefit of metalic is resistance to inflation. It's difficult to obtain more gold, so the underlying asset for the currency cannot grow "by fiat", meaning the whims of the government

Well... if we throw alchemy into the mix then you might be able to grow it hehehehe

Monetarist economists treat moeny like a commodity. They say that inflation arises from excessive increases in money supply versus the underlying "REAL" value of wealth (assets of useful nature) in the economy

@Nightwolf.j2 Ha! Yes. Sort of just what drove the alchemists. But the idea is the limitation of the supply of money

Agreed. No one has really proven that US has enough gold to back its currency, but they sure have been stealing everyone else's!

If you talked to Milton Friedman, he's say it's important that government not be in drivers seat on supply o fmoney

😃

@Earleebird Right. There would be a sudden drastic shift in the market value of gold. Speculators who had inside information on what was about to be proposes (e.g. Congresscritters!!) could make a fortune with the right market positions.

Gold value would basically follow this: Price of gold = Quantity of money / quntity of gold. If less gold is on hand than estimated, the value in gold rpive would be HIHGER. So, a "Long Gold" position would be used

No

I'm not going to listen to them. I went over there to see a comment on their YT site. The comments were hammering them. Withering criticism was everywhere

When they starting callin Q anitsemetic that was when I had enough. ridiculous claim. And Im aware of this tactic.

Q clearance is a designation within the intel community, has an established meaning. Q even joked when shown an image of a coffee cup taken in some base

Part of the problem may be the QuEST for clicks

either inserts, or blackmailed or bribed in my opinion

Could be. Lot's of ways to ingratiate with online persons. I'd personally try donating heavily through their Patreon, then get to know them, and then influence

How ever they got to this point, their tactics are obvious, its obvious they have not been in the diss-info arena for long. they seemes hurried and panicked to me. So they are compromised in my opinon and nothing they say should be taken at face value.

@LmofGOD Obviously Uranium One is what it is. There is credible information out that the process of CFIUS approval was not followed dilligently. Also evidence of credible nature exists that various parites around the globe, especially including Australia and Russia were working very hard on this deal. Uranium is not only a fuel for Utility company reactors but an important precursor (needs enrichment to high level) for nuclear weapons. Thus emerging powers look to obtain this material

Dunno.

Someone else may have an idea

There is so much info on the net stating that Obama was found guilty and his appeal denied and he has to pay back the money he sent to Iran and there are almost as many sites stating it is not true. Does anyone know what the truth is? Thank you.

@OneWing. Interesting, except just having a lot of traffic on something, ALONE is not amounting to proof. There are bursts of mis-information which light up for a while and then die out.

A POTUS would not normally incur Personal Liability (personally owe money) for actions done during office.

Example; Nixon did not have to personally pay $$. Clinton was not facing bankruptcy, but removal from office

@Dvorak8 thanks, that is what I thought too. I really want to be responsible for what I pass on and not end up being used to pass misinformation. Really appreciate your reply. 😃

Sure. We get stuff in here that is speculative. Probably no problemo. I used to be auditor, accountant, etc. So, I try and vett sauce before contributing, but I tend to post web stuff pretty quickly sometimes. The legal aspects are especially tough to suss out sometimes.

@everyone PLease make an avatar, also think before you write somthing, make sure the thought is clear so that others can understand. Please try to craft well written statements in text chat. Thank you. dont forget to make youself an avatar.

Info Wars is controlled opposition.

Okay, I admit being tech challenged, I’ve tried to make an avatar but no go. I’m using an iPad.

Is there a link to watch it?

ok thank you

@Romans 6 done 👍

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-april-2018-national-child-abuse-prevention-month/?utm_source=twitter

@Romans 6 Hooray for our side, I finally got an avatar, now I’m somebody!