Message from @Nicholas
Discord ID: 532609777608556584
Sorry
I am dyslexic
And it’s sort of the same with orthodoxy
Yes, but Canonizations are considered infallible in Catholicism.
Yeah but palamas is not canon
But he is a Saint?
But that doesn’t mean that his ideas were canon
It means that he was a holy man
A very holy man
A heretic cannot become a Saint (at least in Catholicism).
Plus, heretic cannot be "holy"...
Yes they can
You can have a heretic who beloved in god but has a very different view on him
Epic
Does that mean a Muslim or a member of another religion can be holy?
Well
In the Christian god
There are orthodox saints that Catholics recognise
And vice versa
Palamas version of God is not Christian God, that's the point...
>There are orthodox saints that Catholics recognise
Yes, Saints that lived before the Great schism
It’s intentions is Christian
He just didn’t think it over
Your logic is flawed. Then every major heresy in Christianity was "Christian"...
Palamas distinction is somewhat similar to Nestorianism, which was a major heresy in the Early Church history.
What
How
I didn’t call Palamas a Christian
His intentions were Christian
>non Christian
>Saint
Epic
Non Christians cannot be Saints famalam.
I think that you don't know what Saint actually means...
It means a person in heaven.
In Christianity you are sainted for your work and dedication to god
Palamas was dedicated
But he was wrong
>In Christianity you are sainted for your work and dedication to god
Okay....
The word is not sainted, but Canonized.
Orthodoxy has the same definition of a Saint like the Catholics.
A Saint is a person in heaven.
Wel
A saint is acknowledged as holy or virtuous
Regarding the Christian faith
And
For example
If mother Theresa believed that god was multiple persons in the trinity
She would still be sainted
Even though she shouldn’t be
do protestants go to hell
The Canonization of Mother Theresa is not infallible, because she was canonized by an Anti-Pope.