Kill me

NOT everything

Exactly

Sorry

I am dyslexic

And it’s sort of the same with orthodoxy

Yes, but Canonizations are considered infallible in Catholicism.

Yeah but palamas is not canon

But he is a Saint?

But that doesn’t mean that his ideas were canon

It means that he was a holy man

A very holy man

A heretic cannot become a Saint (at least in Catholicism).
Plus, heretic cannot be "holy"...

Yes they can

You can have a heretic who beloved in god but has a very different view on him

Epic
Does that mean a Muslim or a member of another religion can be holy?

Well

In the Christian god

There are orthodox saints that Catholics recognise

And vice versa

Palamas version of God is not Christian God, that's the point...
>There are orthodox saints that Catholics recognise
Yes, Saints that lived before the Great schism

It’s intentions is Christian

He just didn’t think it over

Your logic is flawed. Then every major heresy in Christianity was "Christian"...
Palamas distinction is somewhat similar to Nestorianism, which was a major heresy in the Early Church history.

What

How

I didn’t call Palamas a Christian

His intentions were Christian

>non Christian
>Saint
Epic

Non Christians cannot be Saints famalam.
I think that you don't know what Saint actually means...
It means a person in heaven.

In Christianity you are sainted for your work and dedication to god

Palamas was dedicated

But he was wrong

>In Christianity you are sainted for your work and dedication to god
Okay....
The word is not sainted, but Canonized.
Orthodoxy has the same definition of a Saint like the Catholics.
A Saint is a person in heaven.

Wel

A saint is acknowledged as holy or virtuous

Regarding the Christian faith

And

For example

If mother Theresa believed that god was multiple persons in the trinity

She would still be sainted