Message from @mattforney
Discord ID: 654114224863182878
Flag this vid for hate speech
No
We don't cancel people just because they say things we don't like. We're not the left.
Hell, the dude probably got the idea for the name of his channel from AA. He's pulling Davis Aurini numbers and has no reach outside people like the new Switch owner getting offended and disseminating the content for mass flagging.
@mattforney reading that argument in bechtloffs server gave me aids
Does he just hate Catholics?
Every time he chimed in it was just about how all Catholics hate freedom
@balaclavaman I don't know why he's turning it into an interdenominational fight when the Baptist ironybros like Internet Gaming Hero are anti-porn too
if Bechtloff wants to debate this on his channel I'm down
I’m friends with some American prots and they are more authoritarian than I am
They’re Dixiecrats
They’d be down for a porn ban
when America was more Protestant it was MORE vigorous in combating moral degeneracy
Exactly
And I’m not going to have some brony faggot in that server tell me I hate freedom because I think pornographers should hanged
and as I kept trying to say to those guys, the idea that porn is protected speech was invented in the 1970's by the Supreme Court
prior to that censorship of obscene material on the state and local level was common
They don’t care though
Bring back the Vice Squads
the reason the Hays Code was imposed by Hollywood was because New York and other states were creating film censorship boards and it was easier to self-regulate than to try and satisfy the laws of 50 different states
And Napoleon saying that the founding fathers would agree with him
Brethren instance
yet the Founding Fathers had no problem with Massachusetts and other states passing public morality laws
ffs enticing an unmarried woman into sex was a crime in many places until the 20th century
it was called "seduction"
there was a Canadian premier who had his career ruined after one of his clerks sued him for seduction
I might be on the pro porn side if it wasn't for the supporters. If they were more like Bechtloff and Revenge of the cis guys it would be fine but the majority of them are just hedonistic liars who refuse to recognize the negatives porn inflicts.
I agree with Bechtloff that the anti-porn spergs are going too far
but I'm not gonna fall for the Jewish lie that porn is "speech" because it's not, and everyone prior to the 1970's agreed with me
I like free speech but I would rather not support pornographers. I've been staying neutral for the most part.
Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Joe the Boomer?
I thought not. It's not a story the journalists would tell you. It's a braap legend. Darth Joe was a Dark Lord of the braap, so powerful and so jewish he could use twitter to influence the pagans and wignats to send him money... He had such a knowledge of the dark side that he could even keep the twitter accounts he cared about from being banned. The dark side of the suoerchats is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural. He became so powerful... the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice broseph everything he knew, then his apprentice reported his twitter account in his sleep. Ironic, he could save others from being banned, but not himself
Americans rediscovering that blood is thicker than water. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-12-10/the-u-s-government-s-mistrust-of-chinese-americans
