Message from @SirW00f

Discord ID: 556042311566622730


2019-03-15 08:52:49 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/413932180926889986/556037069554843658/D1rq994X0AEhJ07.jpg

2019-03-15 08:55:58 UTC  

for this i'd go with symbolic place and time, information control/1 pr guy, changing storyline and facts, conflicting eyewitnesses, and gun control now!

2019-03-15 08:56:02 UTC  

to get bingo

2019-03-15 08:56:40 UTC  

yeah no bingo on that card

2019-03-15 08:57:31 UTC  

as more 'info' comes out ....it will look more and more like a ff

2019-03-15 08:58:11 UTC  

yeah but with real bodies they made sure of that

2019-03-15 08:59:08 UTC  

well they made a mistake with the plane crash

2019-03-15 09:02:18 UTC  

Can Q drops be updated please because NZ was mentioned as not big enough to take away the headlines

2019-03-15 09:10:24 UTC  

open source isn't hack proof

2019-03-15 09:10:30 UTC  

it's hack inviting

2019-03-15 09:10:48 UTC  

hackers can proof it

2019-03-15 09:11:17 UTC  

well ya....but if they use open source code, it still means it's hackable

2019-03-15 09:11:40 UTC  

closed source code means nobody can hack it at least for a while til they figure it out on their own

2019-03-15 09:12:01 UTC  

"open source"

2019-03-15 09:12:11 UTC  

hardware doesn't control the hack, it's the software thats hackable

2019-03-15 09:12:20 UTC  

software controls the hardware

2019-03-15 09:12:45 UTC  

no

2019-03-15 09:13:16 UTC  

chips have instructions that can leave them open for attacks

2019-03-15 09:13:37 UTC  

hardware with embedded instructions is still software inside the hardware

2019-03-15 09:13:52 UTC  

even the embedding can be hacked

2019-03-15 09:14:42 UTC  

using standard issue hardware with known embedding leaves open points for attacks via hacks

2019-03-15 09:15:00 UTC  

custom hardware has to be made to resist such attacks

2019-03-15 09:15:47 UTC  

as well as custom software to diagnostic the hardware and other software even embedded custom code in the hardware

2019-03-15 09:15:47 UTC  

close source software means you don't give away the tools to read the code ..in an open internet no body will use that. It doesn't mean the code when in use isn't safe.. on the contrary by allowing hackers to check the code it becomes more secure

2019-03-15 09:16:19 UTC  

not all hackers share their code discoveries

2019-03-15 09:16:42 UTC  

for money they will

2019-03-15 09:16:50 UTC  

malicious hackers will only keep their back door entry points to themselves..only patriot hackers will expose the problems

2019-03-15 09:16:59 UTC  

there is serious money involved

2019-03-15 09:17:27 UTC  

theres always some form of money involved..either for malicious or the patriot

2019-03-15 09:17:38 UTC  

I trust the bakers

2019-03-15 09:18:25 UTC  

in the short run, the patriot hacker will prove themselves for the money...but in the long run, the malicious hackers will exploit the system for the money

2019-03-15 09:18:28 UTC  

how would you do it?

2019-03-15 09:18:59 UTC  

i'm a theorist mostly...not a coder/hacker

2019-03-15 09:20:03 UTC  

I'm more practical and I don't really see it being worse then any other solution

2019-03-15 09:20:37 UTC  

well they need to get off binary based coding for one to be secure

2019-03-15 09:21:36 UTC  

this requires a new form of processing and new forms of data control and management...and code for it

2019-03-15 09:22:18 UTC  

it's early days this on a human scale is another small step don't think we can't expect a perfect system day one

2019-03-15 09:22:55 UTC  

well we went from binary, to 4bit, to 8bit to 16bit, to 32bit, to 64bit ...and so on

2019-03-15 09:22:56 UTC  

could be revolutionary when done right