triggering event - forces fb to be primary source of news since one of the shooters streamed live from it....while fb stock is in free fall from fed raids on it's servers

it's cause and effect to the sheepie

but to the awakened..it's a ff narrative with real deaths to try to sway the un-awakened away from the awakened movement

he saod he went to nz to train

that means contacts with guns

because logically australia is a better place to shoot stuff without being noticed

once in nz he supposedly just decided nz was the better place to do it

for this i'd go with symbolic place and time, information control/1 pr guy, changing storyline and facts, conflicting eyewitnesses, and gun control now!

to get bingo

yeah no bingo on that card

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10mI9PV0iB4&feature=youtu.be

as more 'info' comes out ....it will look more and more like a ff

yeah but with real bodies they made sure of that

well they made a mistake with the plane crash

Can Q drops be updated please because NZ was mentioned as not big enough to take away the headlines

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/7df990c5be78f7873de9adc2e75f74bc59cecde31ffd7c44c8e38e426543e859.png

open source isn't hack proof

it's hack inviting

hackers can proof it

well ya....but if they use open source code, it still means it's hackable

closed source code means nobody can hack it at least for a while til they figure it out on their own

"open source"

hardware doesn't control the hack, it's the software thats hackable

software controls the hardware

no

chips have instructions that can leave them open for attacks

hardware with embedded instructions is still software inside the hardware

even the embedding can be hacked

using standard issue hardware with known embedding leaves open points for attacks via hacks

custom hardware has to be made to resist such attacks

as well as custom software to diagnostic the hardware and other software even embedded custom code in the hardware

close source software means you don't give away the tools to read the code ..in an open internet no body will use that. It doesn't mean the code when in use isn't safe.. on the contrary by allowing hackers to check the code it becomes more secure

not all hackers share their code discoveries

for money they will

malicious hackers will only keep their back door entry points to themselves..only patriot hackers will expose the problems

there is serious money involved

theres always some form of money involved..either for malicious or the patriot

I trust the bakers

in the short run, the patriot hacker will prove themselves for the money...but in the long run, the malicious hackers will exploit the system for the money

how would you do it?