Message from @Innaswamp
Discord ID: 512390277026021379
Ease of use
M79 would be easier.
why
Both are break action Grenade launchers chambered in 40mm grenades right?
M79 fills the same roll as the 320 BUT it cant be used underbarrel, thus causing you to have to produce 2 systems instead of 1 for both roles
But the 320 is shit at both roles.
Too heavy and bulky to be a good underslung and too light and compact to wield effectively on it's own.
how does it being light and compact make it ineffective stand alone
It just looks so *small* every time I see a dude with one in a picture.
Nigga
Maybe they're all big dudes or something but that shit doesn't look easy to shoulder properly
It's an updated thumper I can throw on my rifle
It isn't that bad
The 203 isn’t that bad either
It's not *bad* but we have *better* options for both roles. That's all I'm saying.
It could stand a better mounting system though
And the 302 can take longer grenades
Wait, I wasn't aware of this. Please elaborate.
So I’ve been told anyway
I might be wrong
I mean
I wasn't aware we weren't using the same dimensions.
why would we
In general have shells gotten bigger or smaller then?
Bigger and more optimised
So the 320 can use bigger still 40mm nades than the 203.
Longer
AFAIK
Does that mean they pack more punch? Better range?
Both
More go
And different shell types
Respectfully disagree.
You can get HE, HEDP, flare, smoke, gas, more
Thumper with the sawn off stickn
Stock
Didn't all those exist for the 203 though?
Not as effective in a shorter case
I didn’t know they made HEDP for the man portable launchers
