Also thumpers are easier to aim

Personally I think the GP-25 is a bit better in terms of usability.

Ehhhh

Although shoving a nade into the launcher like they do might make me nervous.

its smaller and lighter but it only really works on the AK platform

Oh I know.

the 203 and 320 can be mounted on a lot of rifles with just the lower rail

I think the Commies made a better Underslung launcher TBH.

They didn't but ok

The 320 has a lot of folk complaining that it's heavy and they miss the m203.

Infantry will bitch about anything

is it heavier? I guess it would be, its a stand alone launcher system just attached underbarrel

True but let's look at the situation.What can the M320 offer over the M203 for the added weight?

Ease of use

M79 would be easier.

why

Both are break action Grenade launchers chambered in 40mm grenades right?

M79 fills the same roll as the 320 BUT it cant be used underbarrel, thus causing you to have to produce 2 systems instead of 1 for both roles

But the 320 is shit at both roles.

Too heavy and bulky to be a good underslung and too light and compact to wield effectively on it's own.

how does it being light and compact make it ineffective stand alone

It just looks so *small* every time I see a dude with one in a picture.

Nigga

Maybe they're all big dudes or something but that shit doesn't look easy to shoulder properly

It's an updated thumper I can throw on my rifle

It isn't that bad

The 203 isn’t that bad either

It's not *bad* but we have *better* options for both roles. That's all I'm saying.

It could stand a better mounting system though

And the 302 can take longer grenades

Wait, I wasn't aware of this. Please elaborate.

So I’ve been told anyway

I might be wrong

Boy did you think we have been using the same shells since nam?

I mean

I wasn't aware we weren't using the same dimensions.

why would we

In general have shells gotten bigger or smaller then?

Bigger and more optimised

So the 320 can use bigger still 40mm nades than the 203.

Longer