It isn't that bad

The 203 isn’t that bad either

It's not *bad* but we have *better* options for both roles. That's all I'm saying.

It could stand a better mounting system though

And the 302 can take longer grenades

Wait, I wasn't aware of this. Please elaborate.

So I’ve been told anyway

I might be wrong

Boy did you think we have been using the same shells since nam?

I mean

I wasn't aware we weren't using the same dimensions.

why would we

In general have shells gotten bigger or smaller then?

Bigger and more optimised

So the 320 can use bigger still 40mm nades than the 203.

Longer

AFAIK

Does that mean they pack more punch? Better range?

Both

More go

And different shell types

That said the 79 looks coolest

Respectfully disagree.

You can get HE, HEDP, flare, smoke, gas, more

Thumper with the sawn off stickn

Stock

Didn't all those exist for the 203 though?

Not as effective in a shorter case

I didn’t know they made HEDP for the man portable launchers

Pretty sure

I thought that was just a mark 19 thing

Maybe?

You've never played ArmA 3 with mods clearly

Its shit hedp but it is hedp

That's like saying ashs grenade is real

That was a joke Swamp.

@FireRising *16 gorillion different 556 mags*

Oh Christ please no

That said, everyone has different opinions on how to use grenade launchers, or indeed, rifle grenades, in combat

BTW I used to like taking a basic bitch M4A1 and then grabbing the 100-round saddle drum tracer mags.

And unlike most other things there’s no clear best one, at least as far as we know