Message from @Runes
Discord ID: 513384681170010113
Its a weapon from the 1960s that's been accurized by pounding a couple parts in with a rubber mallet and loctiting it down when the tolerances are measured right
Yes. And it's not really suited for field conditions.
For what it is they did a fantastic job. Remember that before the EBR, the alternative was pulling a wood stock M14 out of some ancient supply depot and having a SPC put scope rings on it with a cordless drill
Sure it's fine in a NRA hi-power match
And it didn't do a fantastic job. No idea where you're getting this info.
You are supposed to maintain some extra ebrs in armory and mail problematic ones back to the states
Its adequate for the task it needed to do, the fantastic part is how quickly and cheaply the problem was solved
Cheaply?
Are you mad?
Where exactly are you getting this info?
Compared to what the army would have paid for purchase of a new weapons system
Also, the money lost by fielding a temporary platform, only to not be appropriate
They did what they could with what was on the shelf on short notice. Just because they had rack grade M14s on the shelf doesn't mean this was in any way a cheap solution
Im trying to upload pdf
Its fucking with me
Why are people so bent on defending the M14/Mk14/EBR
I don't get it
I think it's aesthetic thing
Well, have you ever accurized a battle rifle? Its not the easiest thing.
So, you're confirming that this was a bad idea.
And it was pushed into DMR service
Standard M14 > EBR looks wise
The EBR was a bad idea
All around
It's like accurizing a FAL
It was pretty impressive to me at least that they took shit that was put in storage in the 80s and within 20 minutes per rifle produced a 1.5moa weapon that could be issued to a soldier
Sure. that's a logistical feat.
You’re taking a 3-4 MOA gun and kludging it into a 1.5 moa gun and expecting it to stay like that
But the problem is that it didn't stay that way
It was such a shitshow before. You'd ask for m14 and get m14 with single magazine covered in dust lmao
You need consistent performance in soldiers' hands
Something that is field servicable and durable
@keldoclock yes because you asked for an M14
Ask for more mags
Done
Tada you have a battle rifle
What's your point?
Im just saying that if you carefully put it back together and maintain the tolerances the accuracy is maintained
It's a military rifle
