Message from @keldoclock
Discord ID: 513381950971707392
Yes and I do
@Reichtangle G43 sights are nice as fuck
Only a retard wouldnt be able to use them.
No they’re good
I like tangent sights, don’t get me wrong
But the aperture provides a generally better sight picture
This nigga can't use tangent sights lmao
I own *one* gun with aperture irons
Everything else is tangent
DIS NIGGA USES APERATURE SIGHTS LMAO
@Magos Squid "The Life Raft" M27 IAR does all that you just described as a force multiplier. The BAR has too much weight and other weapons can fulfill the minor role you described.
Also I know some guys who used an M14 in Afganistan and did fine as designated marksman. They carried less ammo because of the box mags and the fact it took less shots to put down jihadi john.
That being said 1-2 guys I know personally and their anecdotal evidence doesn't change the fact the m14 is so heavy and dated.
Not sure how any of this related to smithing though.
The M14 was fine until you.. removed it from the stock
then all its' accurization disappeared
(regarding the ones built for use in Afghanistan)
Ah
Now that makes more sense
@Runes Not very cash money of the m14 then
Well what do you expect when the rifle is tuned with shims and crush washers. Thats literally every accurate rifle
Its a weapon from the 1960s that's been accurized by pounding a couple parts in with a rubber mallet and loctiting it down when the tolerances are measured right
Yes. And it's not really suited for field conditions.
For what it is they did a fantastic job. Remember that before the EBR, the alternative was pulling a wood stock M14 out of some ancient supply depot and having a SPC put scope rings on it with a cordless drill
Sure it's fine in a NRA hi-power match
And it didn't do a fantastic job. No idea where you're getting this info.
You are supposed to maintain some extra ebrs in armory and mail problematic ones back to the states
Its adequate for the task it needed to do, the fantastic part is how quickly and cheaply the problem was solved
Cheaply?
Are you mad?
Where exactly are you getting this info?
Compared to what the army would have paid for purchase of a new weapons system
Also, the money lost by fielding a temporary platform, only to not be appropriate
They did what they could with what was on the shelf on short notice. Just because they had rack grade M14s on the shelf doesn't mean this was in any way a cheap solution
Im trying to upload pdf
Its fucking with me
Why are people so bent on defending the M14/Mk14/EBR
I don't get it
I think it's aesthetic thing
Well, have you ever accurized a battle rifle? Its not the easiest thing.
So, you're confirming that this was a bad idea.
A battle rifle does not equal a DMR rifle