Message from @Reichtangle

Discord ID: 513384753001398272


2018-11-17 16:00:07 UTC  

And it didn't do a fantastic job. No idea where you're getting this info.

2018-11-17 16:01:33 UTC  

You are supposed to maintain some extra ebrs in armory and mail problematic ones back to the states

2018-11-17 16:02:06 UTC  

Its adequate for the task it needed to do, the fantastic part is how quickly and cheaply the problem was solved

2018-11-17 16:02:11 UTC  

Cheaply?

2018-11-17 16:02:15 UTC  

Are you mad?

2018-11-17 16:04:12 UTC  

Where exactly are you getting this info?

2018-11-17 16:04:16 UTC  

Compared to what the army would have paid for purchase of a new weapons system

2018-11-17 16:04:57 UTC  

Also, the money lost by fielding a temporary platform, only to not be appropriate

2018-11-17 16:05:33 UTC  

They did what they could with what was on the shelf on short notice. Just because they had rack grade M14s on the shelf doesn't mean this was in any way a cheap solution

2018-11-17 16:05:57 UTC  

Im trying to upload pdf

2018-11-17 16:06:03 UTC  

Its fucking with me

2018-11-17 16:06:18 UTC  

Why are people so bent on defending the M14/Mk14/EBR

2018-11-17 16:06:21 UTC  

I don't get it

2018-11-17 16:06:35 UTC  

I think it's aesthetic thing

2018-11-17 16:06:55 UTC  

Well, have you ever accurized a battle rifle? Its not the easiest thing.

2018-11-17 16:07:13 UTC  

So, you're confirming that this was a bad idea.

2018-11-17 16:07:26 UTC  

A battle rifle does not equal a DMR rifle

2018-11-17 16:07:32 UTC  

And it was pushed into DMR service

2018-11-17 16:07:36 UTC  

Standard M14 > EBR looks wise

2018-11-17 16:07:41 UTC  

The EBR was a bad idea

2018-11-17 16:07:43 UTC  

All around

2018-11-17 16:07:43 UTC  

It's like accurizing a FAL

2018-11-17 16:07:58 UTC  

It was pretty impressive to me at least that they took shit that was put in storage in the 80s and within 20 minutes per rifle produced a 1.5moa weapon that could be issued to a soldier

2018-11-17 16:08:18 UTC  

Sure. that's a logistical feat.

2018-11-17 16:08:23 UTC  

You’re taking a 3-4 MOA gun and kludging it into a 1.5 moa gun and expecting it to stay like that

2018-11-17 16:08:34 UTC  

But the problem is that it didn't stay that way

2018-11-17 16:08:38 UTC  

It was such a shitshow before. You'd ask for m14 and get m14 with single magazine covered in dust lmao

2018-11-17 16:08:41 UTC  

You need consistent performance in soldiers' hands

2018-11-17 16:08:56 UTC  

Something that is field servicable and durable

2018-11-17 16:09:01 UTC  

@keldoclock yes because you asked for an M14

2018-11-17 16:09:04 UTC  

Ask for more mags

2018-11-17 16:09:05 UTC  

Done

2018-11-17 16:09:15 UTC  

Tada you have a battle rifle

2018-11-17 16:10:18 UTC  

Says right in the ebr manual not to do anything but clean it &

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/508382218612375565/513385401533071386/Screenshot_2018-11-17-11-09-46-1.png

2018-11-17 16:11:14 UTC  

What's your point?

2018-11-17 16:11:52 UTC  

Im just saying that if you carefully put it back together and maintain the tolerances the accuracy is maintained

2018-11-17 16:12:01 UTC  

It's a military rifle

2018-11-17 16:12:07 UTC  

You damn well better make that thing boot proof

2018-11-17 16:12:21 UTC  

Fielded in a desert country

2018-11-17 16:12:29 UTC  

where everything just gets filled with sand

2018-11-17 16:13:43 UTC  

If a system is so fragile that removing the action one single time ruins everything, it's not appropriate for military service.