Message from @Reichtangle

Discord ID: 517097410049212419


2018-11-27 21:54:50 UTC  

If they never signed, they're not protected and you don't owe them shit

2018-11-27 21:54:51 UTC  

"War is hell" until the other man puts you in hell with hollow point to the gut, if you don't follow the rules don't expect them to be applied to your own situation

2018-11-27 21:55:59 UTC  

Like I said, if they don't follow the various conventions on warfare, you don't have to treat them by those rules.

2018-11-27 21:56:24 UTC  

@Mangy no fucking shit

2018-11-27 21:56:28 UTC  

we aren't the IRA

2018-11-27 21:56:29 UTC  

Both parties have to sign the agreement for it to be binding

2018-11-27 21:56:45 UTC  

legit ISIS and the IRA abuse that

2018-11-27 21:56:54 UTC  

Yep

2018-11-27 21:57:22 UTC  

Yeah, ISIS and IRA arnt subject to these conventions, that's why Idk if what this guy did is really a "war crime"

2018-11-27 21:57:32 UTC  

They're savage animals, and they don't deserve to be treated by the rules of civilized warfare.

2018-11-27 21:57:40 UTC  

^

2018-11-27 21:57:50 UTC  

Uniformed combatants deserve help

2018-11-27 21:58:19 UTC  

Terrorists and irregulars don’t

2018-11-27 21:58:23 UTC  

^

2018-11-27 21:58:26 UTC  

He's not wrong

2018-11-27 21:58:48 UTC  

Also if you fire on red crosses as a matter of tactics you're garbage.

2018-11-27 21:58:54 UTC  

There are some things that make sense and some that don’t within the laws of armed conflict

2018-11-27 21:59:29 UTC  

Things banning cluster munitions or flamethrowers and napalm, for example, are gay

2018-11-27 21:59:48 UTC  

The ones banning blinding weapons are fine, same with gas

2018-11-27 22:00:07 UTC  

I don’t agree with pointless suffering

2018-11-27 22:00:29 UTC  

“Flame weapons cause suffering” is a counterpoint I’ve often heard

2018-11-27 22:00:40 UTC  

Cluster munitions is understandable in that hey are hell to clean up undetonated munitions from. especially if its in a county you give a shit about

2018-11-27 22:00:41 UTC  

If we were serious about getting rid of terrorists, we'd clear out the entire population as Rome did

2018-11-27 22:00:42 UTC  

Tank crews burn to death all the time

2018-11-27 22:00:54 UTC  

Flamethrowers don't make sense tbh

2018-11-27 22:01:03 UTC  

wat

2018-11-27 22:01:05 UTC  

They’re extremely effective

2018-11-27 22:01:06 UTC  

Yes they do

2018-11-27 22:01:24 UTC  

Flamethrowers are highly effective at dealing with fixed positions and urban combat.

2018-11-27 22:01:25 UTC  

Banning them is shooting yourself in the foot if you want to clear an entrenched position

2018-11-27 22:01:31 UTC  

ayyy

2018-11-27 22:01:46 UTC  

You can literally clear a house in one spritz with a flamethrower rather than going in

2018-11-27 22:02:04 UTC  

Flamethrower are gimped by the fact that they make the carrier a priority target

2018-11-27 22:02:24 UTC  

I mean yes and no, but the fuel doesn't explode like hollywood makes it out.

2018-11-27 22:02:55 UTC  

The tank ruptures and you get chucked in the opposite direction, and everything is covered in fuel, but it doesn't explode.

2018-11-27 22:03:06 UTC  

It will sometimes burn though

2018-11-27 22:03:23 UTC  

Sometimes, but since napalm is diesel it's actually really hard to ignite.

2018-11-27 22:03:26 UTC  

And we haven’t designed a flamethrower in decades

2018-11-27 22:03:26 UTC  

How do you get chucked if it doesn't explode? Where's that force come from?

2018-11-27 22:03:32 UTC  

Propellant

2018-11-27 22:03:33 UTC  

Pressurized fuel.