Message from @Flash

Discord ID: 527572111464726528


2018-12-26 19:31:58 UTC  

isn't liberty a human right as well?

2018-12-26 19:35:15 UTC  

They consented to the activity, meaning they are also consenting to the possible affects of it. That choice is a liberty and the fetus an't consent to be aborted, can it?

2018-12-26 19:35:45 UTC  

it can't because it can't even speak

2018-12-26 19:35:55 UTC  

its not alive, its not there

2018-12-26 19:36:15 UTC  

So can we then kill already born children because they can't speak yet?

2018-12-26 19:36:35 UTC  

Don't abort it in the first place. If you don't want it, place it up for adoption after birth

2018-12-26 19:37:02 UTC  

that is an option yes but abortion is a right that women deserve and need for their safety

2018-12-26 19:37:23 UTC  

brb

2018-12-26 19:38:46 UTC  

As I have said multiple times now, women consented to the activities which could result in pregnancy, meaning they consented to the possible results of them. If they didn't consent (as in the case of rape), then it's harder to answer if abortion is alright

2018-12-26 19:39:18 UTC  

The moment a fetus has either brain activity or a heartbeat, it should be considered a living organism.

2018-12-26 19:39:36 UTC  

That doesn't matter, the right to safe abortion is more important than your personal beliefs. As I said 47000 women die every year because of unsafe abortions

2018-12-26 19:39:44 UTC  

Also bodily autonomy mates

2018-12-26 19:39:52 UTC  

@Kraiser Life begins at conception there's been no proof to contradict it

2018-12-26 19:40:38 UTC  

So trample one right to create a new one?

2018-12-26 19:40:45 UTC  

Abortion isn't a human right

2018-12-26 19:41:02 UTC  

When a person is a person is a philosophical question and shouldn't be an argument for or against abortions

2018-12-26 19:41:10 UTC  

As I stated, life for an *organism*, not a multicellular being. When it has working organs, I consider it to be a living animal.

2018-12-26 19:41:55 UTC  

@Marker it somewhat is, for if you were to abort a living being, wouldn't that ultimately be murder?

2018-12-26 19:43:23 UTC  

National catholic register

2018-12-26 19:43:27 UTC  

Nice unbiased source

2018-12-26 19:43:38 UTC  

I gave you 3 sources

2018-12-26 19:44:48 UTC  

Here's a source from the fellas who made the human rights lol

2018-12-26 19:45:36 UTC  

UN is gay

2018-12-26 19:45:37 UTC  
2018-12-26 19:46:03 UTC  

of course the black one gotta be the doctor

2018-12-26 19:46:16 UTC  

Lmfao like that matters @karat

2018-12-26 19:46:24 UTC  

yes

2018-12-26 19:46:28 UTC  

How

2018-12-26 19:46:37 UTC  

Cultural Marxism at its finest

2018-12-26 19:46:51 UTC  

Cultural Marxism @beans

2018-12-26 19:47:08 UTC  

The declaration was passed in 1948, so it wasn't by the current ambassadors. The current UN is also against the death penalty, which seems to contradict their current support for abortion.

2018-12-26 19:47:26 UTC  

lol

2018-12-26 19:47:26 UTC  

Congratulations, @beans for reaching level 11!

2018-12-26 19:47:28 UTC  

oh god

2018-12-26 19:47:32 UTC  

Welcome beans

2018-12-26 19:47:38 UTC  

To this shit show

2018-12-26 19:47:38 UTC  

And I have said 9999999 times now, if they didn't want a pregnancy, **they shouldn't be involved in activities that could lead to it**