"science cannot be trusted because people who do that all like women!!!1!!"

this is your statement you know?

@Victortze I'm. Just making an analogy, none of my original points have been refuted

you sound like a science denier at this point

Goal post stands where it was at

what original point?

Think we need the banhammer

you know what is tree ring ?

banhammer?

Lol threaten a man's beliefs....

you havn't provide a single proof for your statements

so I have nothing to refute to begin with

@shadowlessnexus they want me banned for questioning evolution

I can tell you how carbon dating actually works and that's really it.

@Victortze please do

thats...not ban worthy. but you will be roasted

@shadowlessnexus my validation receptors are destroyed, roast away

compare the c14/c12 ratio to the atomsphere ratio it was in, to get how much half life cycle it went through

@Victortze again it does not tell you the original state, you are aware the atmosphere can change right?

yes which is why, thanks to the tree ring (aka other confirmed dating method) you can calculate how much in atomsphere it had at the time

carbon dating is often recited because its the most well known one

@Victortze if the atmosphere was drastically different in the past which there is evidence of making a linear projection into the past cannot be accurate

but the fact is carbon dating can only work for about 50000 years, we use other isotope for further dating method.

@Victortze the oldest tree ever dated by tree rings was just over 4000 years old

like I said, they use the tree's info to calculate it

Well than I would say it's only accurate to 4000 years

that's why carbon dating is only used for near age, lol

@Reaper doxxed? maybe

Yea but if it's based on a tree that goes back 4000 years how are you assuming it is making a accurate model for 50000 years?

check out Radiometric dating

I never said how accurate it is, I said it only goes that far

the further it is it general have a greater margin of error

But like I said there is plenty of evidence that it gets it wrong, just doesn't get published in "peer edited" papers

actually there is plenty of evidence of when they get it wrong in papers

Peer reviewed*

like I said, stop getting brain washed

science is not social science

people get it wrong all the time

@Victortze most the science were taught is not science

Awww c'mon dude....

So earth is flat?