Message from @Reaper

Discord ID: 544917421346127873


2019-02-12 16:20:35 UTC  

that doesn't really matter, once you know how many wax have burned you can recontruct the model on how tall it would had being

2019-02-12 16:20:52 UTC  

@Victortze no you can't that's the point

2019-02-12 16:21:08 UTC  

You need the size to determine time or vise versa

2019-02-12 16:21:37 UTC  

unless the entire thing is burnt out you would have a bases width left, same reason why we need the fossil itself to determine how much atom is in there

2019-02-12 16:22:24 UTC  

@Victortze that's my point you can know how much carbon the fossil has when you find it

2019-02-12 16:22:41 UTC  

But not when it died or how much carbon it contained at that moment

2019-02-12 16:22:43 UTC  

no you know how much atoms are in there, how much carbon 12/ 14 is in there

2019-02-12 16:22:56 UTC  

**does that mean Earth is only 6000 year old ? 🤔 **

2019-02-12 16:23:11 UTC  

@EdgyEcchis I don't know, I wasn't there

2019-02-12 16:24:02 UTC  

I guess no one here has ever been lied to by an authority figure, oh wait a minute

2019-02-12 16:25:07 UTC  

or maybe you are the one who have being lied to by the same type of people who says Vaccine is bad?

2019-02-12 16:25:19 UTC  

switching to insult people in person will not reinforce your statement

2019-02-12 16:25:19 UTC  

Alls I'm saying is I suspect we have been lied to about more than how woman think I do not accept what I'm told just cause smart ppl think so

2019-02-12 16:26:03 UTC  

Most of those same scientific figures ppl hold on such a pedastal are cucked simps, what does that tell you about the nature of intelligence?

2019-02-12 16:26:33 UTC  

wow, talk about strawmaning

2019-02-12 16:26:37 UTC  

and shifting the goalpost

2019-02-12 16:27:01 UTC  

"science cannot be trusted because people who do that all like women!!!1!!"

2019-02-12 16:27:05 UTC  

this is your statement you know?

2019-02-12 16:27:06 UTC  

@Victortze I'm. Just making an analogy, none of my original points have been refuted

2019-02-12 16:27:12 UTC  

you sound like a science denier at this point

2019-02-12 16:27:17 UTC  

Goal post stands where it was at

2019-02-12 16:27:17 UTC  

what original point?

2019-02-12 16:27:18 UTC  

Think we need the banhammer

2019-02-12 16:27:27 UTC  

you know what is tree ring ?

2019-02-12 16:27:32 UTC  

banhammer?

2019-02-12 16:27:34 UTC  

Lol threaten a man's beliefs....

2019-02-12 16:28:00 UTC  

you havn't provide a single proof for your statements

2019-02-12 16:28:07 UTC  

so I have nothing to refute to begin with

2019-02-12 16:28:14 UTC  

@shadowlessnexus they want me banned for questioning evolution

2019-02-12 16:28:20 UTC  

I can tell you how carbon dating actually works and that's really it.

2019-02-12 16:28:27 UTC  

@Victortze please do

2019-02-12 16:28:31 UTC  

thats...not ban worthy. but you will be roasted

2019-02-12 16:28:59 UTC  

@shadowlessnexus my validation receptors are destroyed, roast away

2019-02-12 16:29:04 UTC  

compare the c14/c12 ratio to the atomsphere ratio it was in, to get how much half life cycle it went through

2019-02-12 16:29:52 UTC  

@Victortze again it does not tell you the original state, you are aware the atmosphere can change right?

2019-02-12 16:30:35 UTC  

yes which is why, thanks to the tree ring (aka other confirmed dating method) you can calculate how much in atomsphere it had at the time

2019-02-12 16:30:54 UTC  

carbon dating is often recited because its the most well known one

2019-02-12 16:31:14 UTC  

@Victortze if the atmosphere was drastically different in the past which there is evidence of making a linear projection into the past cannot be accurate

2019-02-12 16:31:47 UTC  

but the fact is carbon dating can only work for about 50000 years, we use other isotope for further dating method.

2019-02-12 16:31:57 UTC  

@Victortze the oldest tree ever dated by tree rings was just over 4000 years old

2019-02-12 16:31:59 UTC  

like I said, they use the tree's info to calculate it