Exactly where is the goal post, I just got here

as all science, which you admited earlier

so your entire argument is now null

@Baron Doom Up his ass, so there's still a long way to move it further

talk about sperging

@Victortze I never made that argument I suggested that one being a scientist does not put them above reproach

good you got your last non arguement in

thanks for playing

VictortzeToday at 1:59 AM
okay let's make it blunt" there's no such thing as accurate science"
VictortzeToday at 1:59 AM
or you never heard of margin of error?
ReaperToday at 1:59 AM
@Victortze I agree

@Notah that is a bit of a funny place to put a goal post 😉

it gets annoying when i have to keep citing chat history

@Baron Doom That's what I told him, but he insisted

@Victortze accurate science is simply not a concept

vic just leave the dumb science dude alone now. hes clearly broken

I was not arguing all science is wrong

so saying its not science if its not accurate is null

ugh. fine then

since yo ujust admited science have nothing to do with being totally accurate

go to jail

oh arguing about pointless things again

hes in jail now

I'd say science denial is a big problem

that's how you get people stop vaccinating

he cant see this anymore vic

or believe earth is flat and he wil die if he travel too far

Fe people lol

@shadowlessnexus Good job.

and i blame social science for it

E=mc^2 is accurate, but the thing is that is incomplete:

those fake science are undermining the value of science as a whole

fucking dumb scinece guys

@Victortze social sciences is the most inaccurate of all

The real equation is E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2

the problem is his argument is self-defeating

if the scientist are covering up their mistake, how did he find evidence in a science journal?

It's just that if a particle doesn't have p then the equation solves to E=mc^2

Which is energy of mass at rest.

it is

it is still close though

My dad is a flat earther

Trust me