Message from @Noctah

Discord ID: 544928279472111637


2019-02-12 17:07:58 UTC  

good you got your last non arguement in

2019-02-12 17:08:02 UTC  

thanks for playing

2019-02-12 17:08:13 UTC  

VictortzeToday at 1:59 AM
okay let's make it blunt" there's no such thing as accurate science"
VictortzeToday at 1:59 AM
or you never heard of margin of error?
ReaperToday at 1:59 AM
@Victortze I agree

2019-02-12 17:08:19 UTC  

@Notah that is a bit of a funny place to put a goal post 😉

2019-02-12 17:08:22 UTC  

it gets annoying when i have to keep citing chat history

2019-02-12 17:08:35 UTC  

@Baron Doom That's what I told him, but he insisted

2019-02-12 17:08:44 UTC  

@Victortze accurate science is simply not a concept

2019-02-12 17:08:45 UTC  

vic just leave the dumb science dude alone now. hes clearly broken

2019-02-12 17:08:56 UTC  

I was not arguing all science is wrong

2019-02-12 17:09:04 UTC  

so saying its not science if its not accurate is null

2019-02-12 17:09:11 UTC  

ugh. fine then

2019-02-12 17:09:13 UTC  

since yo ujust admited science have nothing to do with being totally accurate

2019-02-12 17:09:14 UTC  

go to jail

2019-02-12 17:09:30 UTC  

oh arguing about pointless things again

2019-02-12 17:09:31 UTC  

hes in jail now

2019-02-12 17:09:44 UTC  

I'd say science denial is a big problem

2019-02-12 17:09:55 UTC  

that's how you get people stop vaccinating

2019-02-12 17:10:07 UTC  

he cant see this anymore vic

2019-02-12 17:10:08 UTC  

or believe earth is flat and he wil die if he travel too far

2019-02-12 17:10:14 UTC  

Fe people lol

2019-02-12 17:10:26 UTC  
2019-02-12 17:10:30 UTC  

and i blame social science for it

2019-02-12 17:10:39 UTC  

E=mc^2 is accurate, but the thing is that is incomplete:

2019-02-12 17:10:39 UTC  

those fake science are undermining the value of science as a whole

2019-02-12 17:11:10 UTC  

fucking dumb scinece guys

2019-02-12 17:11:17 UTC  

@Victortze social sciences is the most inaccurate of all

2019-02-12 17:11:20 UTC  

The real equation is E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2

2019-02-12 17:11:23 UTC  

the problem is his argument is self-defeating

2019-02-12 17:11:36 UTC  

if the scientist are covering up their mistake, how did he find evidence in a science journal?

2019-02-12 17:11:52 UTC  

It's just that if a particle doesn't have p then the equation solves to E=mc^2

2019-02-12 17:12:03 UTC  

Which is energy of mass at rest.

2019-02-12 17:12:26 UTC  

it is

2019-02-12 17:12:51 UTC  

it is still close though

2019-02-12 17:13:03 UTC  

My dad is a flat earther

2019-02-12 17:13:05 UTC  

Trust me

2019-02-12 17:13:15 UTC  

It's better to just put em in time out

2019-02-12 17:13:20 UTC  

also, if they figured out its wrong, they spent time on figuring out how and why its wrong now didn't they?

2019-02-12 17:13:23 UTC  

E= mc²

2019-02-12 17:13:55 UTC  

I have talked to a few flat earthers, I find them wiered

2019-02-12 17:14:15 UTC  

flat earther are retarded because its something you can figure out yourself

2019-02-12 17:14:32 UTC  

its not some high end science requiring a big giant expensive machine