Here's an unpopular opinion: France is the most cancerous thing to happen to 20th century politics (for the west at least) and the world would be a better place if Germany had won WWI.

I disagree, it's one thing to not know much about science, it's another to know nothing and say that all the scientists are in on a giant conspiracy.

I agree but if your best answer to someone saying you're an idiot is: Well I found this retarded guy; you're a bigger idiot that previously thought.

Wut?

Anyway.

Is "fedora" a type of atheist, or a catch-all term for atheists?

I would never call Nietzsche a fedora, I would call Richard Dawkins a fedora.

Most of the scientists I know are atheists.

They just don't talk about it much.

Not sure if your experience or not but ok.

Basically a fedora is someone who's an atheist and they have a smug air of superiority about it as opposed to someone like Nietzsche who was dismayed that God did not exist

I am not at all dismayed.

But are you smug about it?

No.

I suspect the smug ones come from less secular countries.

Nah he is a bit more light hearthed

You'd be surprised. Not many smug atheists in Saudi Arabia

Well, countries that have secular laws, but more religious people.

"I, a genius, threw off the shackles of delusion, unlike all these troglodytes I am surrounded by."

I should probably post more Christian videos tbh.

Eh. The god debate is old news and just bores people today.

There's a reason why skeptics went after SJWs.

They wanted those sweet views not debates. But I'll post it tomorrow.

Debates that no one will watch, yes.

The internet has moved on to more intelligent things, like making people cry on livestreams.

I prefer this old debate about God than ethical CP.

But hopefully Mauritian Struggle will be on Adam Racewarski's stream and bring a new light on the matter.

Is this a venting place now?

Everyday I realize left anti-sjw like Sargon, Vee ,Louis Le Fag, etc would have been ok with this progressive shit if they hadn't touched their vydia and porn.

And I stand by saying that fedoras who don't know shit about theology are just as dumb as creationists.

https://youtu.be/LmbyWGCwX90

Well, I'm going to vent how much I hate it when someone takes something and doesn't put it back in its place. I also hate messy kitchens. And I harshly judge people who wait last minute to plan something for someone else, or getting a last minute gift. Especially if they're cheap about it.

You know, to be honest, despite being raised a protestant, I find a central figure for a church to be a good idea. I don't think I could be a Catholic, because the rotting, shambling edifice of Il Vaticano repulses me, but I could see myself becoming an Orthodox Christian or something of that sort.

I wish Pius XIII had been the pope.

Knowing little about theology does not make you as stupid as a creationist.

It does when you're trying to attack religion.

It helps generally to have a good understanding of what you're arguing against, no?

I think ebowden likes to disagree for the sake of disagreeing.

No. I don't think religion is like science at all.

Not believing in unfalsifiable ideas is a perfectly defensible position.

I'm talking about someone having an opinion or arguing against something when they know nothing about it. The opinion holds no weight or value. That's why I agree that atheists that don't know shit about theology are just as dumb as creationists, mirroring what Old Valet said.