Message from @meijinsan
Discord ID: 392559465158934528
STDs don’t have rights
They were aware there was a risk, yet did not consent to being infected.
Would you have unprotected sex if you knew it would result in a baby
That it has rights does not change whether or not you cosnented.
It is really that simple.
Consenting In unprotected sex = consenting to have a baby
You know what we shoul do? Ban welfare, support community charity, and incourage sex when married.
It’s really that simple
Unless you can't keep propositions straight in your head.
Sorry
No, it isn't. If that is true, then having unprotected sex is consenting to being POZed, and those cali nutters are right.
Consenting to unprotected sex = consenting to the possibility of conceiving a child
Now you are shifting the goalposts.
no u
I said sorry?
I literally just saw him shift the goalposts.
You are both faggots, none of you are giving solutions as to why it happens.
But 9/10 times a child is conceived?
Use protection.
I agree
If you can’t look after a child don’t have unprotected sex it isn’t hard guys
Talking about rights does not obligate you to search for solutions, shithead.
Now now no name calling
The minute you attack someone personally you lose the debate
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you are literally giving reasons as to why we should legalize abortion, a solution to those reasons.
looks like someone is losing their temper
Saying that sex should be protected doesn’t support abortion ?
I am quite calm. However, when someone is a shithead, I call them that.
Not in a debate my friend
What?
lol
That is really gay @meijinsan :^)
We are not attack each other’s characters, we are attacking ideas
<:calebHart:157931367420788737> @Valet the Clown
Who made this rule? You can't hurt fifis with mean words in the halls debate (trademark)?
No adhom in this room
™
lol
HOW do you get that tm?