besides the general explanation which has been true throughout history: wars are a quick and dirty way of propping up an otherwise unpopular or lackluster domestic regime, sinking blood and treasure into it too fast for anyone to keep track of; and it's easy to call critics insufficiently patriotic.
I don't just mean Brexit. I mean the Queen could have said something against mass immigration, secularization, the rise of Islam, grooming gangs, and the erosion of freedom of speech at any point during her reign. She didn't.
How is it fair for, for example, the British to become minorities in their own homeland to peoples that have ethnic homelands to go back to? What is happening is insane and it just blows my mind.
And it's only European peoples that are so beaten down to have care about their own ethnic lineage to be corroded away, non-Europeans are ethnocentric as fuck.
How the hell is this going to work in the future when European peoples are minorities everywhere, even in their respective homelands? When the French are minorities in France, Germans in Germany, Swedes in Sweden?
Meanwhile you have these Utopian retards arguing how this is good and desirable, that the world is going to come together under law and equal treatment of all.
Someone wrote in an argument to me "Human nature can be dealt with if the sense for national identity is elevated above ethnic identity. It worked for decades of emigrating cultures. Come in ,learn the language, embrace the concepts. It is the subversion of that process from the leftists that have turned the nation into a collection of more insular communities"
"The only impossible task is the one you don't embark on. Is it a long shot. Sure. But the principles of the Constitution are that important. Liberty is never more than one generation away from extinction. Thankfully, generation z is promising, though Trump isn't helping us in the mean time"
He said "The Culture of America can be retained, with the ethnic subsets. Like a good stew. You don't erase the individual identity of the components, but each add to the richness of the gravy."
Multiculturism can work when the cultures are similar enough but when you try combining things that are too alien to each other, without of them being subsumed into the larger culture, there's always going to be problems.
I think this globalist mentality is evil. It treats countries as economic zones rather than the homes of nations. The people, instead of being those of ethnic lineages, cultures, and families, they are economic units.
To them, a Somali immigrating to Sweden is as much a Swede as a Swedish person that was born in and grew up in Sweden, who is the result of an unbroken chain of familial lineage.
That's what liberals say. But actions speak louder than words. Liberals may talk about how wonderful diversity is, but if they really believed in their heart of hearts that diversity was wonderful, they would live in diverse areas. And almost none of them do.
These multicultural globalists are no better than the Communists, they are Utopian ideologues pushing a very dangerous social experiment that could very well lead to terrible destruction
@Graham multiculturalism is insane. I have studied and I still study multiple (European) languages like French and Russian which is very helpful because I learn about European cultures as well. Sure we are not perfect but a lot better than most of Asian and -dare I say- every African and South American culture. To see our only homelands slowly razed to ground by a bunch of insane and sometimes malevolent godless elites for the sake of a small dose of pity-inflicted dopamine is heartbreaking
@Largezo112 Yes it's very insane. And even if all cultures and peoples were the same except for aesthetics in their physical appearance and culture, it still would be wrong
