yep, like I said, in denial

Oh, so you know what is in my head better than I do?

And besides, countries have been toppled over and destroyed for the sake of capital as well. Sorry, everyone's shit stinks, not just communism's.

if you read back what we've been talking about on here, it's clearly visible you are advocating for something that is similar to it, but you don't want to use the name.

evidence needed

Really? If its so clear, please explain where I *clearly* advocated for it.

you hate the current system, and you are posing the same questions leftists do, and coming to conclusions leftists do. problem is, your premises are wrong. I clarified a lot of it, if it didn't help, not my fault

gynocentrism is off the table now, we are talking about economy.

>implying that his arguments are flawless

lol

*missing argument error*

>I'm missing an argument

>clearly hasn't been paying attention to the discussion

Whatever dude. Do what thou wilt. Its clear that we never lived on the same planet and that we never will. It was an interesting, discussion none the least.

look, I've debated enough to know when it comes to these childish non-arguments, you clearly have nothing else to say, and this is the point when I quit. I really have other things to do, but I can't say I haven't tried. not everyone will get it, it is what it is

(just make sure you don't become part of antifa)

If we are going to be recommending things that we should or should not do, I would recommend listening to some Zizek.

btw I'm fine with having disagreements, but I'm not fine with having these childish name callings. you should have the right to say whatever you will, and I'm willing to defend it. but you also have to be able to take criticism and accept that you might be wrong

You called me a communist first...

I never said that I was.

Don't cast stones in glass houses, as the saying goes.

then you have communist views all but in name :)

meh

there are many different schools of communist thought on the left.

it doesn't matter what you call it, you can call it the great religion of the beaten dogs, for all I care. the name is not what counts, it's the idea behind it, that wrecked societies throughout time

Not all of them necessarily agree on what communism is, much less who is and who isn't.

OK... is it one idea, or many different ideas?

the generic idea what you've been talking about is, the forced redistribution of wealth

I've never said that I was in favor of the forced redistribution of wealth.

If anything I'm much more radical and crazy.

I want people to be able to live without needing wealth at all.

That is much more freeing than needing a state or dictatorship of the proletariat to redistribute anything.

aha, and who would be producing your at least minimal needs for survival then?

in what sense, exactly?

food, shelter, water?

People would do it themselves without the need of capital, money, or the state.

but why would they?

wait, you mean you as an individual, would do it for yourself?

Because people don't want to be naked, cold or dehydrated lol

People would do it collectively.

Parents would still care for their children, and entirely new social organization would sprout up.