Something tells me Sand was bound to lose his regardless and not particularly just because of MGTOW.

Why?

His channel was not particularly in good straights when it came to how he treated his userbase, even his patrons of all people. He made a few videos insulting and harassing his own patrons, one of them over his grammar.

i joined the youtube party late so they already blocked new channels from getting monetized

whereas sandman thinking ape and tfm got in before the new policies

Sandman also loves to abuse the word incel around to those who he disagree with. Like Men 101 does...

I have knew Sand since 2014, but this was still when I was anti-MGTOW.

I think i have some retarded 5y/o minecraft channel thats monetized

Off topic but I appreciate that the dank memes channel symbol is a toilet

And anime babes is a present

And anime babes is a gift

It takes a lot to convince me to change ideals or abandon believes. It took me a long time before I came to accept MGTOW.

i picked em xD

I am a natural die-hard.

I only come here 4 the babes lol

Granted I was still an MRA years ago when I first discovered MGTOW.

2008.

Stardusk got demonetized as well though.

Does he even upload anymore

It's easy for me to be invisible to women when I'm short and a bit r o t u n d

Sometimes invisibility serves as a blessing in disguise for me...

I also think it’s helping because women are becoming more and more self-absorbed

I have a friend who is athletic, thin and 6'. A tinder thot told him he wasn't tall enough

That's when I knew

Definitely true. It is getting awful than it once was. But my chronic nightmares already indicated such type of outcome.

Its rare I ever get a good nights rest, let alone a good dream.

Call me doom and gloom, but at least he helps me retain vigilance.

Stardusk does upload stuff.

Personally though, I and wondering. For some of you MGTOW getting kvatched by YouTube. Is there no way to sue them for misconduct/censorship?

Prager U (as much as I strongly dislike them) are doing that.

I doubt it given it's a self governing private platform

Nope, it would be within their EULA to be able to do this.

EULA is still beholden to federal law.

They can simply state it doesn't fit our community guidelines so you're not going to monetized.

So censorship of free speech that is not illegal content, not even violating rules they've the right to discriminate?!?

When it's something you agreed to, it doesn't mean shit if it beholden to federal law. That's how most EULAs are worded.

There’s always avenues like patreon twitch ect

So if I was to write a EULA for my business that condones racism against Native Americans, I wont have to worry about being sued or axed?

Patreon and Twitch are not neutral.

Well, how are you going to get the court to see this as a case of discrimination based of any of those things?

By condone, not encourage, I mean tolerate.

What i am sayn is that youtube is not the 1 and only and can ultimately shoot them self’s in the foot like myspace 4 example