if they don't need each other, then why are there men and woman? why aren't we just asexual? we need woman to diversify the genetic pool

you simply cannot use realize or recognize or notice properly in place of each other... they sound similar but are totally distinct

@ValleyAnt How would you explain how magnets work, and how molecules are formed with all this?

from an evolution stnad point

there is always a trade off in anything you do, you just need to look hard enough

yes but thats sexuality, not positive and negative since neither gender can be classes as positive or negative but neutral (and therefore we have positives AND negatives which is what neutral is)

no

there is a cause or reason or origin for everything, but not a trade-off for everything... theres a difference

"Positive needs negative and vice versa" is also like saying "You can't make money if you don't have a job. They go together." REALLY? We all know, though we must stop and think a while, THAT isn't true

you dont need dirty to have clean

they are self-existing and legitimate without each other

it's not that they need each other, but by having one you induce a fact that the other exists - it's boolean logic

wait a minute...When we talk about what dirty is compared to clean, we need some sort of labels that help us understand our reality through language. All of this is just relative

Clean can exist independently of dirty

they can exist without each other, but if they weren't 'connected' that you wouldnt label one postive or negative - it would just be itself

but we wouldn't know dirty until we label it relative to what our ideas of what clean is

"Clean can exist independently of dirty" - the only reason you think something is clean is because you've compared it to a relative cleanliness of something that was more dirty than itself

we live on a neutral planet (of positives and negatives), and THAT's why it's hard for you to see that they dont need each other

thats inferior thinking to have to compare things to make sense of them

if that was true then none of us should be angry at women for comparing men with men-- something men generally dont do

if there was no light, we couldn't see any shapes... but we could still FEEL shapes. It would be fallacious reasoning to say, "There's no light and I can't see, therefore there are no shapes." Shapes don't need light to exist; they need light to be seen. Positive and negative dont need each other to exist, but having each other makes it easier for (apparently most) people to see them

we're not angry at women comparing men to men - it's a reflection of how they feel inadequate themselves and outlet their frustration

well not angry but not happy either

its upsetting and immature

I can sort make sense of that

you are always their number something other than `

other than 1

their number one is Brad Pitt or Justin Beiber or Usher or someone else

but positives and negatives dont work that way

nothingness is the absence of something-ness so to speak

they can exist apart from each other though nothingness is hard for most to comprehend

just give me a second, i'm re-assessing my thought process and implementing your idea

sure

Im gonna have a smoke and be back but before that...

before phones were invented, there were no phones... what is the opposite of having no phones? Having no phones? A coin, in this respect, doesn't have to have two sides... in this dimension a coin can have only one side... bbl

well i got to get to bed

ok i think i got it

food for thought today. every time I come to this server I learn something new

but in this regard, couldn't you call 'nothingness' the negative and having the something there a positiv?

That's what I would think as well

Nothingness would be a void