Message from @Hotfirex

Discord ID: 531406449742708746


2019-01-06 09:37:08 UTC  

mgtow has always been the true nature of men.

2019-01-06 09:37:20 UTC  

Mgtow is a philosophy not a movement

2019-01-06 09:37:33 UTC  

>< MGTOW is about helping men self actualize. It is not a political movement for garnering votes.

2019-01-06 09:37:50 UTC  

to go ones own way is how men of value comport themselves anyway.

2019-01-06 09:37:53 UTC  

We just recently named it.

2019-01-06 09:38:04 UTC  

Whats wrong with becoming big enough as a movement to help mens lives

2019-01-06 09:38:06 UTC  

Mgtow isn't about taking women's rights away, however I am for taking women's rights away and I'm a mgtow

2019-01-06 09:38:25 UTC  

I just want to watch the world burn

2019-01-06 09:38:34 UTC  

But if I can benefit why not

2019-01-06 09:38:44 UTC  

Do you steal jewels from warlords and then scatter them on the side of the road?

2019-01-06 09:38:58 UTC  

Are men and women equal by nature?

2019-01-06 09:39:04 UTC  

no

2019-01-06 09:39:09 UTC  

Or is one smarter and stronger

2019-01-06 09:39:16 UTC  

Yes

2019-01-06 09:39:22 UTC  

Then true nature makes us unequal

2019-01-06 09:39:23 UTC  

men have a flatter bell curve.

2019-01-06 09:39:25 UTC  

they dont call it man kind for no reason

2019-01-06 09:39:27 UTC  

Men are at the top

2019-01-06 09:39:28 UTC  

@IT G MA! It's not wrong but doing that would co-opt MGTOW away from what it does. It changes the focus of people within it and at that point it would just be the MRM... so if you want to focus on votes and politics to improve mens lives just go to the MRM it is literally there for THAT EXACT PURPOSE!

2019-01-06 09:39:29 UTC  

we're both smarter and dumber.

2019-01-06 09:39:30 UTC  

Apex

2019-01-06 09:40:16 UTC  

@Xychotic Wrong, the bell curves have the same distribution with men's being a mean 5 pts higher.

2019-01-06 09:40:24 UTC  

We can still help the MRM while still being mgtow we can be both if we so choose

2019-01-06 09:40:32 UTC  

Oh? Source, please.

2019-01-06 09:40:46 UTC  

@Xychotic That chart you are referring to comes from the 1983 Court study, you want the 1994 Ravens study.

2019-01-06 09:40:51 UTC  

Give me a minute.

2019-01-06 09:41:02 UTC  

Can you read a study or am I giving you a youtube link?

2019-01-06 09:41:03 UTC  

Try to catch 2 bunnies you get none son

2019-01-06 09:41:15 UTC  

Someone redpill me on the following:

2019-01-06 09:41:54 UTC  

I can't rectify TFM's stance with the MGTOW marriage stance.

2019-01-06 09:42:14 UTC  

MGTOW says no marriage.

2019-01-06 09:42:23 UTC  

I already found the report on the raven's study.

2019-01-06 09:42:32 UTC  

When the chance to vote for something that is positive towards men comes up why wouldn't you vote for that. You can still be mgtow but that doesn't mean you shouldn't vote and just watch the world burn....

2019-01-06 09:42:39 UTC  

But TFM is always talking about replacement population levels.

2019-01-06 09:42:43 UTC  

I didn't want to be doing somersaults trying to fit my foot in my mouth and my head up my ass at the same time... like a feminist.

2019-01-06 09:43:16 UTC  

If you take women's rights away, how are you going to increase the population, yet have no marriage?

2019-01-06 09:43:39 UTC  

If we took their rights away, we wouldn't have to worry about marriage.

2019-01-06 09:43:49 UTC  

Keep marriage just alter it to benifit both genders

2019-01-06 09:44:01 UTC  

@IT G MA! That is fine, if you want to post hey a vote is coming up for this or that feel free. But that is something YOU are doing, that is not a MGTOW as a whole thing.

2019-01-06 09:44:06 UTC  

i personally still wouldn't want to get married

2019-01-06 09:44:10 UTC  

Personally, I think the gov't needs to get itself out of the marriage business altogether and let us define the terms ourselves.