I guess so

thats lije

false

it's just a possibility thats more likely than in hetero relationships

its not some rule or guarantee

@Deleted User so snuggles are fine?

The word “uranism,” which some use to mean homosexuality, springs from Plato’s distinction between Aphrodite Urania and Aphrodite Pandemia; Aphrodite Urania is the goddess of a noble love which is not carnal and unconcerned with procreaticn, as is the love which has woman as its object.

>women being objects is a bad thing

We can then assume homosexuality to conform to these carnal conditions or to correspond to ordinary sexual relations between man and woman, then we may well describe it as a deviation, not from a conventional or ethical point of view, but precisely from the stand-point of the metaphysics of sex.

if your going to use root words as an argument

@Deleted User cuddle okay

yay!

So bassicly sex-havers are bad

Basically, what I'm saying is, homosexuality is fine in the context of platonic relationships, but when homosexuality becomes widely accepted, if often stops being platonic. In a civilization where equality is the standard, where differences are not linked, where promiscuity is in favour, in a splintered and materialistic society, the phenomenon of regression and homosexuality are particularly welcome, and therefore it is in no way a surprise to see the alarming increase in homosexuality in the democratic period. @Deleted User

I don't get it.

That would count as part of the joke

What joke?

LMAO

@Deleted User have you ever been in a homosexual relationship

Yes

how many?

One guy. It has literally been my only serious relationship.

ah

is that the main baises for your argument?

No, I base my arguments on metaphysics, philosophy and general observation of ancient societies where homosexuality was widely accepted. If you read the last pages of the Symposium and the speech of Alcibiades, you realize how little the eros of homosexuality remained “Platonic” in Hellas and how it also led increasingly to carnal developments as the ancient customs in Greece and Rome declined.

Ur basically bending over and asking the text walls to come

All I can do is suggest you read Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex, by Julius Evola.

uh hu

i think your partially right

legitimately

homosexual relationships have the potential to just platonic sex

its happened to me its happened to people i know

but i've also had heterosexual relationships turn into that

"Platonic sex" is an oxymoron.

and i've seen homosexuals have long love filled relationships

depends on the context of platonic

if i'm talking platonic in the sexual sense obviously, but i clearly mean it in the emotional sense

Platonic love is a romantic relationship that is non-sexual.

it has multiple definitions either way you understand the point i was making

i could've gone with emotionless carnal acts but i didnt feel like typing that out