Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 494934579052806145


2018-09-27 18:06:16 UTC  

and then you feel a little empty

2018-09-27 18:06:48 UTC  

What?

2018-09-27 18:06:49 UTC  

🆙 | **Catboys are Trad! leveled up!**

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/489003669493121031/494932945589764106/levelup.png

2018-09-27 18:07:05 UTC  

guys can be dif than girls

2018-09-27 18:07:14 UTC  

Guy dating is bad

2018-09-27 18:07:22 UTC  

i wouldn't say that

2018-09-27 18:07:31 UTC  

guy dating has its pros and cons

2018-09-27 18:08:06 UTC  

I just want to be a housewife ;_;

2018-09-27 18:08:33 UTC  

Homosexuality is fine in the context of Platonic relationships, but actual same-sex acts are materialistic and lead to a fall from grace.

2018-09-27 18:08:47 UTC  

I guess so

2018-09-27 18:08:51 UTC  

thats lije

2018-09-27 18:08:52 UTC  

false

2018-09-27 18:09:23 UTC  

it's just a possibility thats more likely than in hetero relationships

2018-09-27 18:09:33 UTC  

its not some rule or guarantee

2018-09-27 18:10:51 UTC  

@Deleted User so snuggles are fine?

2018-09-27 18:11:55 UTC  

The word “uranism,” which some use to mean homosexuality, springs from Plato’s distinction between Aphrodite Urania and Aphrodite Pandemia; Aphrodite Urania is the goddess of a noble love which is not carnal and unconcerned with procreaticn, as is the love which has woman as its object.

2018-09-27 18:12:46 UTC  

>women being objects is a bad thing

2018-09-27 18:12:50 UTC  

We can then assume homosexuality to conform to these carnal conditions or to correspond to ordinary sexual relations between man and woman, then we may well describe it as a deviation, not from a conventional or ethical point of view, but precisely from the stand-point of the metaphysics of sex.

2018-09-27 18:12:52 UTC  

if your going to use root words as an argument

2018-09-27 18:13:05 UTC  

@Deleted User cuddle okay

2018-09-27 18:13:19 UTC  

yay!

2018-09-27 18:18:48 UTC  

So bassicly sex-havers are bad

2018-09-27 18:20:00 UTC  

Basically, what I'm saying is, homosexuality is fine in the context of platonic relationships, but when homosexuality becomes widely accepted, if often stops being platonic. In a civilization where equality is the standard, where differences are not linked, where promiscuity is in favour, in a splintered and materialistic society, the phenomenon of regression and homosexuality are particularly welcome, and therefore it is in no way a surprise to see the alarming increase in homosexuality in the democratic period. @Deleted User

2018-09-27 18:20:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/489003669493121031/494936353935458314/image0.jpg

2018-09-27 18:20:32 UTC  

I don't get it.

2018-09-27 18:20:54 UTC  

That would count as part of the joke

2018-09-27 18:21:01 UTC  

What joke?

2018-09-27 18:21:03 UTC  

LMAO

2018-09-27 18:21:29 UTC  

@Deleted User have you ever been in a homosexual relationship

2018-09-27 18:21:51 UTC  

Yes

2018-09-27 18:23:11 UTC  

how many?

2018-09-27 18:24:14 UTC  

One guy. It has literally been my only serious relationship.

2018-09-27 18:24:39 UTC  

ah

2018-09-27 18:24:55 UTC  

is that the main baises for your argument?

2018-09-27 18:26:37 UTC  

No, I base my arguments on metaphysics, philosophy and general observation of ancient societies where homosexuality was widely accepted. If you read the last pages of the Symposium and the speech of Alcibiades, you realize how little the eros of homosexuality remained “Platonic” in Hellas and how it also led increasingly to carnal developments as the ancient customs in Greece and Rome declined.

2018-09-27 18:26:37 UTC  

Ur basically bending over and asking the text walls to come

2018-09-27 18:28:16 UTC  

All I can do is suggest you read Eros and the Mysteries of Love: The Metaphysics of Sex, by Julius Evola.

2018-09-27 18:28:28 UTC  

uh hu

2018-09-27 18:28:34 UTC  

i think your partially right

2018-09-27 18:28:41 UTC  

legitimately

2018-09-27 18:29:10 UTC  

homosexual relationships have the potential to just platonic sex