Message from @gabe_brouse
Discord ID: 285265339124678656
Who wins in a fight? 100 Abbos or 100 feather Indians?
Indians.
Abos were amazingly shit at warfare, never had the concept of land ownership.
Indians knew how to kill.
Before gun powder and horses?
Modern day abos aren't really known for combat either.
They had no war, no land, no civilization, nomadic for 12000 years, no written language or agriculture.
Same religion, same culture, same tribal structure since the birth of humanity as far as we know it.
Any cave paintings?
The Iroquis had confederations, they had a written language, they had trade, they had conquest, bows and arrows.
Yes.
Link of cave paintings?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/b5/85/3d/b5853d6572356a38254ab736c032d953.jpg
This is the most common type of stuff.
They got clay, wet it on the ground and painted with sticks, outlines of hands or put it on their hands.
Almost a hand turkey
Some would take the clay in their mouth, wet it with their spit and spray it onto the cave wall over their hand.
Pretty good brah
lmao, thats still stone age-tier
tbh
Aboriginals are stone age tier.
ehh
Tfw better art than what I can do
It represents the clawing hands of every single abbo trying to climb out of hell.
kek
They never developed copper smithing, they literally never reached the copper age.
Deep
They never got a written language, they never settled villages.
hence "stone-tier"
Yes.
Stick tier
indians i mean
Same could be said of "natives"
Indians at least reached tribal confederation.
They weren't civilized by any definition but were on their way to developing a civilization.
Nomad life and such
Aztecs were actually approaching iron age technology.
Inca were similarly "relatively advanced"
Brah, Aztecs =/= native American
^
That shit will get you shanked
If you say that
theres a significant difference