this is how the left wants it

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJm1gI0W4AABDo9.jpg

I find iconoclasm really disdainful

who is the statue of?

Fucking Ben Shapiro trying to justify the actions taken

Oh yeah it's ok that we just airstriked another middle eastern country

It wasn't assassinating GUYS

Because we used a fucking missile instead of a bullet

All I hope is that america doesn't start another war

Entirely justifiable.

So the US embassy was attacked a few days. Iraq is still a shithole and isn't a true democracy. Spontanious protests outside of embassy's do not happen, and only occur if the Government organizes one, or allows one to be organized.

The protest group in question, protesting against the initial US strike were not Iraqi native, but a group supported by Irans Revolutionary Guard.

The statue is a war Hero Called Manuel Baquedano

not true democracy

https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Manuel_Baquedano

It then... 3 days later JUST SO HAPPENS, that the head of the Quds - The Revolutionary Guards irregular warfare and intelligence section... was in Iraq... travelling around an airport in Baghdad... with Iraqi military officials...

Oh yeah... *a spontanious protest all right*

Iran attacked the US embassy in Iraq by proxy and the US killed him.

If you attack embassy's you get what you fucking deserve <:GetDownOnTheBarn:590619824640753697>

lol there's no such a thing as spontaneous protests 😄

they are always organized ...

well he is a bit like General Ulises Grant , don't know if that's a divisive character in the US

Libia or Lybia?

https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1212949713219194881?s=19

there is a easy way to fix this

just say the Americans accidently killed Qasem Soleimani and that this has just been one huge logistics cock up

i mean it can't be classed as a act of war if this was just one huge fuck up

Or just accuse Iran of orchestrating the attacks on their embassy, and declare that this would have been an act of war upon the united states etc etc... but they killed those responsible, therefore avenged.

either one could work

well its either these two options or war which am sure won't back fire in any single way what so ever

https://www-nytimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/01/03/world/middleeast/iranian-general-qassem-soleimani-killed.amp.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15780642544050&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2020%2F01%2F03%2Fworld%2Fmiddleeast%2Firanian-general-qassem-soleimani-killed.html

Maybe it's best the US just pulls out of the middle east and have russia deal with the middle east

They don't take out High Value targets out for no reason like Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani must have been planning something big.

I was thinking the same I see a lot of fearmongering and anger from comments on this attack and doing a bit of digging if what I read is to believed Iran likely lied about having no military presence in Irak,may have instigated the attack on the US ambassy in Baghdad and theirs the question why an Iran general went to Irak. A lot of things are happening behind closed doors which makes judging this attack impulsive at best.

gotta say i'm in awe at the surgical precision of the attack

Iran will tak big but they will lay low for a while it was a good blow

the US should project more big dick energy around the world

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmr02axc0ts

this was a live interview where his feed was cut after this video ends.

https://youtu.be/i6PZglPsLp0

What do you think of this?