Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 654226634445946880


2019-12-08 19:10:21 UTC  

next election they need a new leader, Scheers way to weak, we need someone more in your face, telling you how it is

2019-12-08 19:11:56 UTC  

yep we need more of a conservative network similar to dailywire and what the US has

2019-12-08 19:12:09 UTC  

we dont have conservative thought leaders other than rebel media

2019-12-08 19:13:00 UTC  

not to mention other political media personalitys, the only one that comes to mind for me is Raging Humanist

2019-12-08 19:13:45 UTC  

and maybe the Canadian Coalitian for Firearms Rights, but they are more focused on the Firearms side of politics

2019-12-08 19:14:41 UTC  

We need more politically active Media personalitys, we dont have people like Akkad or Tim Pool who talk about Canadian politics

2019-12-08 19:43:47 UTC  

Canadians are far too enamoured with american politics.

2019-12-08 19:59:34 UTC  

SFO!

2019-12-08 22:23:06 UTC  

SFO is great cause he's literally the only person of note on the internet that talks about Canadian politics

2019-12-08 22:23:56 UTC  

I would like a more conservative voice to talk about Ca politics as well, and cover more issues like the gun shit, but SFO is against the liberal bullshit so he's the next best thing

2019-12-09 01:37:40 UTC  

yea hes alright

2019-12-09 03:23:02 UTC  

SFO? never heard of it but now i wanna know more

2019-12-09 03:24:16 UTC  

whats the SFO part?

2019-12-09 03:33:08 UTC  

short fat otaku

2019-12-09 03:39:48 UTC  

ty

2019-12-09 16:53:29 UTC  

Theres canadapoli who ran for ppc in guelph. He does daily videos. Pretty dry. But he isnt a dummy. Theres also frank whats his face that also ran for ppc

2019-12-11 01:22:07 UTC  

Prohibition has proven time and time again to be ineffective like I wish the Authoritarian Right get over that.

2019-12-11 05:36:41 UTC  

Something being illegal has proven to reduce the amount of use of that thing.
The real problem is *why* people are drinking and being coomers, which have even more extreme solutions.

2019-12-11 05:37:31 UTC  

If the choice is between banning porn and outlawing no-fault divorce, they're gonna go for the ban.

2019-12-11 07:43:04 UTC  

>Illegality of a thing has proven to reduce that thing
*Effective enforcement* of the law reduces crimes. Law itself doesn't do much if anything at all.
Enforcing a porn ban is therefore not going to reduce porn consumption because it's impossible to enforce.

2019-12-11 07:43:34 UTC  

Or rather, if it were to be enforced, that would violate a number of human rights laws.

2019-12-11 07:45:40 UTC  

My hypothesis: the anti-porn campaign is moral outreeeeeeeeeeege by jealouts tradcons who feel bad when looking at porn. So now they project their own personal shortcomings onto the whole of society.

2019-12-11 07:46:16 UTC  

Also
#PornDidNothingWrong

2019-12-11 14:36:27 UTC  

let her eat poop bigot

2019-12-11 14:40:35 UTC  

incurable disease and brain damage is a human right goyim

2019-12-11 16:19:42 UTC  

@Jake the Exile Within reason

2019-12-11 16:19:55 UTC  

That's a extreme.

2019-12-11 16:22:01 UTC  

The whole porn outrage in the last few days is hilarious

2019-12-11 16:23:32 UTC  

It's like, I sorta want to troll them and say "maybe if they turned off your pron you'd have to go outside for a change!"

2019-12-11 16:24:01 UTC  

But I've realized now that it's such a huge social crutch for so many people because gender relations have completely broken down

2019-12-11 16:25:07 UTC  

They make so many excuses and passes and treat it like the game violence scare or satanic panic, when it's actually harmful on the level of alcohol abuse

2019-12-11 16:26:22 UTC  

It gets passed off as anti-semitism too because it's such a cohencidence that the j00s are responsible for making people want to eat ass and suck toes

2019-12-11 16:26:57 UTC  

It's certainly not helping gender relations I'll tell you that

2019-12-11 16:27:09 UTC  

It leads to bad expectations on both sides

2019-12-11 16:29:32 UTC  

And they pass it off with the same primitive first-vector excuse: the Bad Parenting maneuver.

2019-12-11 16:30:52 UTC  

They expect censorship to not work in a collective sense but do expect it to work in a family sense? It's a non-argument and I've always hated it, even before realizing why it was wrong.

2019-12-11 16:33:25 UTC  

Like shooting up schools, no amount of "good parenting(tm)" is going to improve the shitty school system. Being hardcore conservative in the home won't improve things since that's not where they spend most of their time. Blaming parents is just shifting the blame.

2019-12-11 16:35:52 UTC  

Happy men make safe societies

2019-12-11 16:37:51 UTC  

Happy men have loving wives and children, not a premium Snapchat.

2019-12-11 16:38:07 UTC  

That's your personal bias