>Illegality of a thing has proven to reduce that thing
*Effective enforcement* of the law reduces crimes. Law itself doesn't do much if anything at all.
Enforcing a porn ban is therefore not going to reduce porn consumption because it's impossible to enforce.

Or rather, if it were to be enforced, that would violate a number of human rights laws.

My hypothesis: the anti-porn campaign is moral outreeeeeeeeeeege by jealouts tradcons who feel bad when looking at porn. So now they project their own personal shortcomings onto the whole of society.

Also
#PornDidNothingWrong

let her eat poop bigot

incurable disease and brain damage is a human right goyim

@Jake the Exile Within reason

That's a extreme.

The whole porn outrage in the last few days is hilarious

It's like, I sorta want to troll them and say "maybe if they turned off your pron you'd have to go outside for a change!"

But I've realized now that it's such a huge social crutch for so many people because gender relations have completely broken down

They make so many excuses and passes and treat it like the game violence scare or satanic panic, when it's actually harmful on the level of alcohol abuse

It gets passed off as anti-semitism too because it's such a cohencidence that the j00s are responsible for making people want to eat ass and suck toes

It's certainly not helping gender relations I'll tell you that

It leads to bad expectations on both sides

And they pass it off with the same primitive first-vector excuse: the Bad Parenting maneuver.

They expect censorship to not work in a collective sense but do expect it to work in a family sense? It's a non-argument and I've always hated it, even before realizing why it was wrong.

Like shooting up schools, no amount of "good parenting(tm)" is going to improve the shitty school system. Being hardcore conservative in the home won't improve things since that's not where they spend most of their time. Blaming parents is just shifting the blame.

Happy men make safe societies

Happy men have loving wives and children, not a premium Snapchat.

That's your personal bias

I think we're not going far enough

Give men hyper realistic sex dolls to live with and see the patriarchy make its long deserved comeback

In fact go even further than that, make those sex dolls into hyper realistic sex robots

We didn't get to having 7 billion people on Earth with men not liking women and children.

Men will still like women and children if or when the sex robot revolution happens

They will just regain their rightful position in the dating market

If the main problem with mating is women being dissatisfied with men and men not being able to provide for them, what makes you think all those men will be able to afford sex robots?

Like, sex slaves are literally cheaper

That's going too far

People aren't going to become better and shape up if we go down that path

People will look for a cheaper alternative if objects are all that men focus on

Single men are wealthier than married men

Neither will better themselves and the people selling these toys will wring their hands as the incel shekels pour in.

We may even see a resurgence in human trafficking because of this.

Nothing can replace a real woman.

The opposite will happen if hyperrealistic sex robots become a thing

Less human trafficking because the demand goes down

Do you trust an Alexa in your home?

What?

A voice-activated assistant that by design listens to everything you say and can be modified for surveillance?