in our case , it was a 1980s constitution pushed by Pinochet, although he didn’t actually write it but the best constitutionalists our country had, and despite the constitution was changed and modfied by a socialist president on 2005 , they pushed the fact its a constitution funded on a opression

Security teams don't have the right to determine what is a crime or not. @Brue

same way the UK has people say the empire was the biggest evil of the world

@SuperHeroDeluxe they merly watch crimes, alert people that they may be commiting crimes, and then reporting them to the police if they do not stop, no force is used

@SuperHeroDeluxe the police are the final say

No, judges are

this is true

i should say they do not use violence

This isn't Judge Dredd

Or intimidation

so if theyre unarmed and clearly marked as police with no more authority than ordinary citizen, and only report what could be potentially criminal activity are they ok?

if i see that my neighbors house has someone i do not know walking around the back, im going to approach him, stop him, and ask what he is doing

marked as "mot" police

not

Sure, it's up to you. @Brue

now i get a team together in my community, and we do that on a larger scale

when does it become unethical for you

3 people?

6

10?

when they break the law

When they pretend to have police powers and start intimidating people

I don't care how many. It's the actions they take

some people would say that the man holding the walrus tusk at the london bridge this weekend intimidated the suspect before police got there, and i say, good on them

intimidation is relative

im sure the feminist who sits in her bubble when told about something outside of it is intimidated

should we never approach anyone for fear of intimidating them @SuperHeroDeluxe ?

feminists today are intimidated by everthing

it pays well

@Frost509 its true, i think superhero would probably side with them according to his logic

its relative as can be

-----

i am fairly certain if the man who was looking into my neighbors house heard me say that what he was doing was fishy and if he does not explain himself and have a good reason to do what he was doing i will report this to the police, he will be intimidated

-------

i ask these `what about` questions because it helps identify logical inconstancies @SuperHeroDeluxe

Does it? Or does it just more likely explore the edges of a linguistic model?

it does bolth, though I don't know what this conversation was about.

It can do both, yes

it's important to know how a system is going to deal with the edge cases.

Sure

It CAN be important